...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of World Intellectual Property >How Are Indigenous and Local Communities' Rights Over Their Traditional Knowledge and Genetic Resources Protected in Current Free Trade Negotiations? Highlighting the Draft Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TTPA)
【24h】

How Are Indigenous and Local Communities' Rights Over Their Traditional Knowledge and Genetic Resources Protected in Current Free Trade Negotiations? Highlighting the Draft Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TTPA)

机译：当前的自由贸易谈判如何保护土著和地方社区对其传统知识和遗传资源的权利？强调跨太平洋伙伴关系协议草案（TTPA）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The article analyzes the relevant traditional knowledge provisions of two chapters of the TTPA: on intellectual property rights and on the environment. There is no agreement where these provisions shall be included. There is also wide disagreement over the content of the specific provisions. Some states want to have a widest possible scope of the public domain, and no provisions for sanctioning the taking of genetic resources and associated traditional intellectual property without the consent of indigenous peoples and local communities. The article investigates whether and in which form indigenous peoples are given stronger rights over their intellectual property in international legal instruments, compared to non-indigenous traditional communities. It finds that in many legal instruments, there is no difference. The strongest provisions on traditional knowledge are, however, found in an instrument that applies only to indigenous peoples, the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). The article also investigates whether the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities are stronger in the realm of traditional knowledge than in the realm of genetic resources. It finds that this is generally the case. The provisions are analyzed from the perspective of collective decision-making, defensive protection and positive protection.
机译：本文分析了TTPA两章的有关传统知识的规定：关于知识产权和环境。没有协议将这些规定包括在内。在具体规定的内容上也存在广泛分歧。一些州希望在公共领域拥有尽可能广泛的范围，并且在未征得土著人民和当地社区同意的情况下，没有任何条款规定制裁对遗传资源和相关传统知识产权的获取。本文调查了与非土著传统社区相比，国际法律文书中土著人民是否以及以何种形式被赋予了对其知识产权的更强权利。它发现在许多法律文书中没有区别。但是，在一项仅适用于土著人民的文书《联合国土著人民权利宣言》（UNDRIP）中找到了有关传统知识的最强有力的规定。本文还调查了传统知识领域的土著人民和地方社区的权利是否比遗传资源领域的权利更强。它发现通常是这种情况。从集体决策，防御性保护和积极保护的角度分析了这些规定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号