• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of world trade >Dispute Resolution in Investment Treaties: Balancing the Rights of Investors and Host States
【24h】

Dispute Resolution in Investment Treaties: Balancing the Rights of Investors and Host States

机译：解决投资条约中的争端：平衡投资者和东道国的权利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Bilateral and multilateral investment treaties permit investors to bypass the courts of their host States and have their investment disputes resolved through arbitration. Challenges e.g., by Phillip Morris to the Australian government plain packaging of cigarettes legislation, has caused a rethink of the appropriateness of arbitration as the means of resolving investor state disputes. New and better ways of balancing the rights of States to legislate in the public interest of their citizens on the one hand, and protecting investor property rights on the other are being sought out. This paper argues that the preferred way of achieving this needed balance is through the enactment of a general exception in the form of Article XX of GATT and Article XIV of GATS, which is incorporated into an international convention, and made applicable by incorporation to all bilateral and multilateral investment agreements.
机译：双边和多边投资条约允许投资者绕开其所在国的法院，并通过仲裁解决其投资纠纷。菲利普·莫里斯（Phillip Morris）对澳大利亚政府无烟香烟包装立法的挑战，引起了人们对仲裁是否适合作为解决投资者与国家间争端的手段的重新思考。人们正在寻求新的更好的方法，一方面平衡国家为公民的公共利益立法的权利，另一方面保护投资者的财产权。本文认为，实现这一必要平衡的首选方式是通过颁布一般例外，以GATT第XX条和GATS第XIV条的形式纳入国际公约，并通过纳入所有双边公约而适用。和多边投资协议。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of world trade》 |2015年第1期|85-116|共32页
  • 作者

    Razeen Sappideen; Ling Ling He;

  • 作者单位

    University of Western Sydney Law School;

    University of Southern Queensland Law School;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号