首页> 外文期刊>Sprache und Datenverarbeitung >A classification of German verbs using empirical language data and concepts of Vendler and Dowty
【24h】

A classification of German verbs using empirical language data and concepts of Vendler and Dowty

机译:使用经验语言数据以及Vendler和Dowty概念对德语动词进行分类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The central question of this study is whether abstract semantic properties of verbs are a classificatory criterion in the mental lexicon. This study compares classifications of German verbs based on empirical language data with classifications based on semantic models using 35 verbs taken on the basis of Schumacher's classification (1986). We consider four semantic classifications: the classification presented in Schumacher (1986) who used concrete lexical semantic properties of verbs, and three classifications that use abstract semantic properties of verbs related to aspect and transitivity: a Vendler (1967) inspired typology, a classification using Dowty's (1991) concepts of prototypical thematic roles and our own distinction of five verb classes (Richter and van Hout 2010) We used four empirical data sets for investigating classification patterns of verbs. Two data sets were obtained from co-occurrence patterns in corpus data (usage based), the other two were obtained from human judgments (user based). Our results show that the classifications inferred from the user based and the usage based data sets can be explained to a large degree by semantic models built on abstract verb properties. We draw the conclusion that abstract semantic properties have a classificatory value in the mental lexicon.
机译:这项研究的中心问题是动词的抽象语义特性是否是心理词典中的分类标准。本研究将基于经验语言数据的德语动词分类与基于基于舒马赫分类法(1986年)采用的35个动词的语义模型分类进行比较。我们考虑了四种语义分类:在Schumacher(1986)中提出的使用动词的具体词法语义属性的分类,以及三种使用与方面和及物性相关的动词抽象语义属性的分类:Vendler(1967)启发性类型学, Dowty(1991)的原型主题角色概念以及我们对五个动词类别的区分(Richter和van Hout 2010),我们使用四个经验数据集来研究动词的分类模式。从语料库数据的共现模式中获得了两个数据集(基于使用情况),而从人类判断中获得了另外两个数据集(基于用户)。我们的结果表明,通过基于抽象动词属性的语义模型,可以从很大程度上解释从用户和基于使用情况的数据集推断出的分类。我们得出的结论是,抽象语义属性在心理词典中具有分类价值。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Sprache und Datenverarbeitung》 |2014年第2期|81-117119|共38页
  • 作者单位

    Radboud University Nijmegen Centre for Language Studies Erasmusplein 1, 6525 HT Nijmegen Niederlande;

    Radboud University Nijmegen Centre for Language Studies Erasmusplein 1, 6525 HT Nijmegen Niederlande;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号