...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Leadership >A discursive analysis of the in situ construction of (Japanese) leadership and leader identity in a research interview. Implications for leadership research
【24h】

A discursive analysis of the in situ construction of (Japanese) leadership and leader identity in a research interview. Implications for leadership research

机译：在研究访谈中对（日本）领导者和领导者身份的就地建设进行话语分析。对领导力研究的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Interviews are a way, if not the key way, in which knowledge of leadership and leader identity is sought. Yet, the interviews as a site of the construction of this knowledge are often "black-boxed" and few scholars consider how the "what" of leadership and leader identity are constructed as in situ social practice. Taking a discursive approach to leadership, and using membership categorization analysis as a methodological tool, this paper considers the identity work that participants do when constructing (Japanese) leadership and leader identity in a research interview. Findings indicate that leader identity is fragmented and contradictory and that identity work is skewed to producing a morally acceptable leader identity that has little to do with revealing underlying truths of leadership as often assumed. On the basis of these findings, we call for the discursive turn in leadership research to go beyond considering leadership-in-action to also consider the way in which both meanings of leadership and leader identities are discursively constructed as in situ social practice, notably in research interviews. Second, we call for more careful consideration and analysis of research interview as a site for building knowledge of leadership and leader identities, which, close analysis reveals to be fluid, changeable, and even contradictory. Third, we argue that researchers should also analyze what the particular constructions of leadership and leader identities "do." This aligns with calls for more critical approaches to leadership studies that challenge hegemonic views of leadership and seek to make visible the power dynamics of presenting leadership and leader identity in one way rather than another.
机译：面试是寻求领导力和领导者身份知识的一种方法（即使不是关键方法）。然而，作为这种知识建构场所的访谈通常是“黑匣子”的，很少有学者考虑到如何在现场社会实践中构建领导力和领导者身份的“内容”。本文采用一种领导力话语方法，并使用成员资格分类分析作为方法论工具，在研究访谈中考虑参与者在构建（日本）领导力和领导者身份时所做的身份工作。研究结果表明，领导者的身份是支离破碎且相互矛盾的，而身份工作则倾向于产生一种道德上可以接受的领导者的身份，而这与揭示通常所假定的领导者的内在真理没有多大关系。基于这些发现，我们呼吁领导力研究中的话语转向不仅要考虑行动中的领导者，还应考虑将话语权和领导者身份的含义作为原位社会实践进行话语建构的方式，特别是在实践中。研究访谈。其次，我们呼吁对研究访谈进行更仔细的考虑和分析，以此作为建立领导力和领导者身份知识的站点，仔细分析后发现这是不稳定的，易变的，甚至矛盾的。第三，我们认为研究人员还应该分析领导力和领导者身份的特殊结构“做什么”。这与要求采用更关键的领导力研究方法相呼应，这些方法挑战了对领导权的霸权主义观点，并试图以一种而不是另一种方式展现领导力和领导者身份的动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号