首页> 外文期刊>Literary & linguistic computing >The two Oldcastles of London
【24h】

The two Oldcastles of London

机译:伦敦的两个古堡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Various features of R Stylo were applied to quartos Q1 (1600) and Q2 (1619) of Sir John Oldcastle, a play performed by the Lord Admiral's Men in November 1599 and written by Anthony Munday, Michael Drayton, Robert Wilson, and Richard Hathwaye, according to Henslowe's diary. Reference texts by Drayton and Hathwaye were not available, but those of Munday and Wilson did not surface stylistically anywhere in the texts. Instead, stylistic features of Shakespeare's reference texts were abundant and explain why Q2 was subtitled 'written by William Shakespeare'. Likewise, Dekker's 'additions' were absent. As the Lord Chamberlain's Men also performed a play that was referred to as Sir John Old Castell, the assumption is that Shakespeare's play somehow crossed over to Henslowe's theatrical company. Multiple approaches (rolling delta, rolling classify, bootstrap consensus tree, Craig's zeta) all come to the same conclusions.
机译:R斯蒂洛(R Stylo)的各种功能被应用到约翰·奥德卡斯尔爵士(John Oldcastle)的四季度Q1(1600)和Q2(1619)中,这是由海军上将勋爵的部下于1599年11月演出的戏剧,由安东尼·蒙迪,迈克尔·德雷顿,罗伯特·威尔逊和理查德·哈斯韦伊撰写,根据亨斯洛的日记。 Drayton和Hathwaye的参考文献尚不可用,但Munday和Wilson的参考文献并未在样式上浮出水面。取而代之的是,莎士比亚参考文献的文体特征丰富,并解释了为什么第二季的副标题是“威廉·莎士比亚”。同样,Dekker的“添加项”也不存在。由于张伯伦大人的表演也被称为约翰·奥古斯特·卡斯特爵士,因此假设莎士比亚的戏剧以某种方式与亨斯洛的戏剧公司交涉。多种方法(滚动增量,滚动分类,自举共识树,Craig的zeta)都得出相同的结论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Literary & linguistic computing》 |2017年第4期|788-796|共9页
  • 作者

    Ilsemann Hartmut;

  • 作者单位

    Leibniz Univ Hannover, Dept English, Boschhof 2 C, D-30655 Hannover, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号