• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Marine policy >Rights and ownership in sea country: implications of marine renewable energy for indigenous and local communities
【24h】

Rights and ownership in sea country: implications of marine renewable energy for indigenous and local communities

机译：海洋国的权利和所有权：海洋可再生能源对土著和地方社区的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The adoption of UN Convention of the Law of the Sea in 1982 created optimism for indigenous peoples and marginalised coastal communities that they may (re)gain control of, or improve access to, marine resources. However concerns were also raised that opening the seas to industrial development might create threats for traditional users of the sea. Twenty-five years later the potential enclosure of large areas of coastal seas to marine renewable energy development is reigniting debates about marine governance, access and control over marine resources. Case studies in Scotland, Canada, New Zealand and Australia reveal a dynamic tension between: an economic development 'blue growth' agenda requiring the creation of private rights in the sea; and socio-political drivers which seek to address historic injustices and increase access to natural resources by indigenous and marginalised coastal communities. As yet there is little evidence of this tension being adequately addressed by emerging institutional frameworks for managing marine resources.
机译：1982年通过的《联合国海洋法公约》使土著人民和边缘化沿海社区感到乐观，他们可以（重新）控制或改善海洋资源的获取。但是，也有人担心，向海洋开放以促进工业发展可能会对传统的海洋使用者构成威胁。 25年后，沿海大面积区域可能被海洋可再生能源开发所包围，这引发了有关海洋治理，海洋资源获取和控制的争论。在苏格兰，加拿大，新西兰和澳大利亚的案例研究表明，两者之间存在着动态的张力：经济发展的“蓝色增长”议程要求在海洋中建立私人权利；以及寻求解决历史上的不公正现象并增加土著和边缘化沿海社区获取自然资源的社会政治驱动力。迄今为止，几乎没有证据表明通过管理海洋资源的新体制框架可以充分解决这种紧张关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号