首页> 外文期刊>Measurement >Promoting Rigorous Validation Practice: An Applied Perspective
【24h】

Promoting Rigorous Validation Practice: An Applied Perspective

机译:推广严格的验证实践:应用前景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As researchers at a testing organization concerned with the appropriate uses and validity evidence for our assessments, we provide an applied perspective related to the issues raised in the focus article (Newton, this issue). Newton's proposal for elaborating the consensus definition of validity is offered with the intention to reduce the risks of inadequate validation practice. His article is taken in the spirit of helping our profession to improve with the ultimate goal of protecting the public in the interpretation and use of test scores, and we wholeheartedly support his intent. However, we wonder if not more can be done, in particular, from a practitioner's viewpoint. Specifically, we address (a) the question of whether the proposed changes to the definition will improve validation practice, (b) theoretical versus practical issues and implications for promoting rigorous validity research, and (c) possible next steps for our profession.
机译:由于测试组织的研究人员关注我们评估的适当用途和有效性证据,因此我们提供了与重点文章(牛顿,本期)中提出的问题相关的应用观点。牛顿提出了关于有效性的共识定义的提议,旨在减少验证实践不充分的风险。他的文章本着帮助我们的职业发展的精神,以保护公众在测试成绩的解释和使用中的最终目标为宗旨,我们竭诚支持他的意图。但是,我们想知道是否可以做更多的事情,特别是从从业者的角度来看。具体来说,我们要解决以下问题:(a)建议对定义进行的更改是否会改善验证实践;(b)理论与实践问题以及对促进严格有效性研究的影响,以及(c)我们专业可能采取的下一步措施。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Measurement》 |2012年第4期|88-92|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Research & Development, The College Board, 661 Penn Street, Suite B, Newtown, PA 18940;

    The College Board;

    The College Board;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号