Commentary on Ruscio et al.: 'Measuring Scholarly Impact Using Modern Citation-Based Indices'

John Panaretos; Chrisovaladis C. Malesios

首页> 外文期刊>Measurement >Commentary on Ruscio et al.: 'Measuring Scholarly Impact Using Modern Citation-Based Indices'

【24h】

Commentary on Ruscio et al.: 'Measuring Scholarly Impact Using Modern Citation-Based Indices'

机译：对Ruscio等人的评论：“使用基于现代引文的索引来衡量学术影响力”

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

There is currently a surge of interest in comparing research impact and performance at various levels, for instance ranking countries, universities, departments, programs, journals, and even individual scientists. These rankings are typically based on certain simple bibliometric measures, such as impact factors, the h index, and so forth. This interest is not purely academic; it is part of a more general ongoing political debate at international, national, and institutional levels since rankings have caught the attention of policy makers. The findings of these measures have caused serious concern in some countries, and new policies have been put in place to improve on their lagging performance. Even in Europe, the apparent lagging of performance compared to the United States has generated policy discussions. The lagging of Europe has been established in a number of studies for different disciplines (see, e.g., Panaretos & Malesios, 2012, for mathematics).

机译：目前，人们比较各个级别的研究影响和绩效的兴趣激增，例如，排名国家，大学，部门，计划，期刊，甚至是单个科学家。这些排名通常基于某些简单的文献计量方法，例如影响因子，h指数等。这种兴趣并非纯粹是学术性的。由于排名引起了政策制定者的关注，因此它是国际，国家和机构层面正在进行的更广泛的政治辩论的一部分。这些措施的发现在一些国家引起了严重的关注，并且已经出台了新的政策来改善其落后的表现。即使在欧洲，与美国相比，明显的绩效下降也引发了政策讨论。欧洲的滞后性已经在针对不同学科的许多研究中得以确立（例如，参见Panaretos＆Malesios，2012，关于数学）。

著录项

来源
《Measurement》 |2012年第4期|164-166|共3页
作者
John Panaretos; Chrisovaladis C. Malesios;
展开▼
作者单位

Department of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece, Patission 76, 104 34, Athens, Greece;

Department of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business;

展开▼
收录信息美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Measuring Scholarly Impact Using Modern Citation-Based Indices [J] . John Ruscio, Florence Seaman, Carianne DOriano, Measurement . 2012,第1a4期

机译：使用基于现代引文的索引来衡量学术影响力
2. Devastating Impact of Fracture Nonunions: The Need for Timely Identification and Intervention for High-Risk Patients Commentary on an article by Patrick C-Schottel, MD, et al.: "Time Trade-Off as a Measure of Health-Related Quality of Life: Long Bone Nonunions Have a Devastating Impact" [J] . Mundi Raman, Bhandari Mohit The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume . 2015,第17期

机译：骨折骨不连的毁灭性影响：需要对高风险患者进行及时识别和干预的评论：医学博士Patrick C-Schottel等人的文章：“时间权衡作为衡量健康相关生活质量的一种手段：长骨骨联合会具有毁灭性的影响”
3. Commentary on Fitzgerald et al. (2016): Gender differences in the impact of population-level policy interventions will depend upon what you measure [J] . Connor Jennie Addiction . 2016,第10期

机译：对Fitzgerald等的评论。（2016年）：人口政策干预影响中的性别差异将取决于您所衡量的
4. A Citation-Based Recommender System for Scholarly Paper Recommendation [C] . Khalid Haruna, Maizatul Akmar Ismail, Abdullahi Baffa Bichi, International conference on computational science and its applications . 2018

机译：基于引文的学术论文推荐系统
5. The Impact of Confidence Indices and Long-Term Valuation Measures on the US Stock Market. [D] . Bunn, Oliver Detmar. 2013

机译：置信指数和长期评估指标对美国股票市场的影响。
6. Use of the g-index for assessment of citation-based scholarly activity of United States radiation oncology residents and subsequent choice of academic versus private practice career [O] . Shearwood McClelland III, Timur Mitin, Nima Nabavizadeh, 2019

机译：使用g指数评估美国放射肿瘤学居民基于引用的学术活动以及随后选择学术还是私人职业
7. Hypertension and adiposity indices: commentary on the associations of adiposity indices with hypertension in Brazil (Souza et al., 2019) [O] . Nasheeta Peer 2019

机译：高血压和肥胖指数：巴西高血压倾向指数协会评论（Souza等，2019）

Commentary on Ruscio et al.: 'Measuring Scholarly Impact Using Modern Citation-Based Indices'

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅