首页> 外文期刊>Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning >Mentoring Together: A Literature Review of Group Mentoring
【24h】

Mentoring Together: A Literature Review of Group Mentoring

机译:一起指导:小组指导的文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Researchers have shown the benefits of mentoring in both personal and professional growth. It would seem that group mentoring would only enhance those benefits. This work represents a literature review of peer-reviewed articles and dissertations that contribute to the theory and research of group mentoring. This work reviews the articles that contributed to the development of group mentoring theory as well as relevant research. Four primary types of group mentoring emerge—peer group, one-to-many, many-to-one, and many-to-many. Despite over 20 years of research, significant gaps remain in the research methods, demographic focus, and fields of study. The review concludes with recommendations for future research.View full textDownload full textKeywordsmentoring, group, peer, collaborative, multiple, communities, teamRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.645599
机译:研究人员已经表明了指导对个人和职业成长的好处。团体指导似乎只会增加这些好处。这项工作代表了对同行评审文章和学位论文的文献综述,这些论文和论文为小组指导的理论和研究做出了贡献。这项工作回顾了有助于团体指导理论和相关研究发展的文章。出现了四种主要的小组指导类型:对等小组,一对多,多对一和多对多。尽管进行了20多年的研究,但在研究方法,人口统计重点和研究领域方面仍存在巨大差距。审查总结了对未来研究的建议。查看全文下载全文关键字关键字指导,小组,同级,协作,多个,社区,团队相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati, Delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.645599

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号