...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Military review >The Use of 'Stryker' in Doctrine Is Limiting and Symptomatic of Docrtinal Shorcomings That Are Harmful to Small-Unit Leaders
【24h】

The Use of 'Stryker' in Doctrine Is Limiting and Symptomatic of Docrtinal Shorcomings That Are Harmful to Small-Unit Leaders

机译：在学说中使用“ Stryker”限制了对小班子领导人有害的教义新词

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In doctrine, the use of the term "Stryker" to refer to formations and their associated capabilities is unduly limiting.1 It is symptomatic of shortcomings in the U.S. Army's doctrinal framework behind the medium-force concept. These gaps in the Stryker programs doctrine, training, and materiel are causing the total Stryker concept to function sub-optimally as a whole. Changing "Stryker" to "Medium" in doctrine would help drive any additional doctrinal changes necessary to allow small-unit leaders to think comparatively about peer-competitive concepts. This change would also help clarify the medium concept's place in the current Army brigade combat team (BCT) framework and establish the medium force's role distinct from infantry brigade combat teams (IBCTs) and armored brigade combat teams (ABCTs).
机译：在学说上，使用“ Stryker”一词来指代编队及其相关能力受到了不适当的限制。1这是美军中型部队概念背后的理论框架缺陷的征兆。 Stryker计划的学说，培训和物资方面的这些差距导致整个Stryker概念在整体上无法达到最佳状态。将学说中的“史翠克”更改为“中”，将有助于推动必要的其他教义变更，以使小规模的领导者可以相对地考虑同业竞争的概念。这一变化还将有助于阐明中型概念在当前陆军旅战斗队（BCT）框架中的地位，并确定中队的作用与步兵旅战斗队（IBCT）和装甲旅战斗队（ABCT）不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号