• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Military review >Incompatibility and Divorce of Institutions
【24h】

Incompatibility and Divorce of Institutions

机译：机构的不相容性和离婚

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To conclude that antiwar rallies did not contribute to ROTC's disappearance is incorrect. The antiwar atmosphere had a substantial role in questioning ROTC, but there is a dichotomy between the role of antiwar protesters and anti-ROTC advocates. Without the encouragement for ROTC's dismissal from various anti-ROTC groups on campus, the training program would have continued unhindered. For the faculty ROTC undermined academia's notion of titles and the definition of departments. ROTC's academic courses competed with classes and majors subsisted by Yale College-professors believed the courses to be threatened or disrespected by ROTC's prohibitions. Along with the academic issue, a collection of minor reasons quickened the end to ROTC. Religious leadership by Coffin trickled second thoughts through the ranks of ROTC cadets and midshipmen, young men already shaken and intimidated by the lack of support from the Yale Corporation. The combination of a student body already uninterested in military service and Brewster's coeducational reform catapulted ROTC into a weak position. What had been the true framework of reasons for ROTC's dismissal, however, was misinterpreted by the public. Still to this day, the American people understand the ROTC discussion as a politicized drama when in fact, its expulsion from Yale should be understood as a mainly apolitical academic conflict propelled and obscured by the tribulations of the Vietnam War. In essence, the Yale ROTC debate had ramifications for the military other than losing what was once an undoubtedly ROTC-friendly institution. Many national colleges and universities highly respected Yale's vision and closely followed the decisions of the administration eagerly to make sense of their own school's stance. In the days after Brewster's withdrawal of ROTC's academic credits, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Montana, and Missouri State University, to name a few, immediately sent letters asking for memos and documents dictating the reasoning behind the presidents decision.37 After the university's announcement, the last class commissioned in Yale ROTC was in 1972. In May 1972, only ten or so students in the inactive ROTC program were completing drills by themselves without proper uniform in a run-down facility off campus.38 What had represented an achievement and building stone for the university faded away for forty years until its return in 2012. The departure of ROTC left certain individuals bitter and others rejoicing. It narrates a story about a collection of sides-each wanting responsibility and justice for their causes-in a turbulent time. Uncovered, the Yale ROTC debate epitomizes an event in a war now presented in more light and now told with more truth.
机译：为了得出结论，反战群体没有贡献ROTC的失踪是不正确的。反战气氛在询问ROTC中具有重要作用，但反战抗议者和反ROTC倡导者的作用之间存在二分法。如果没有鼓励ROTC在校园上的各种反ROTC集团解雇，培训计划将继续阻碍。对于教师ROTC破坏了学术界的标题概念和部门的定义。 ROTC的学术课程与Yale College教授的课堂和专业竞争，相信课程被ROTC禁止威胁或不尊重。随着学术问题，一系列次要原因加快了ROTC的结束。 Coffin的宗教领导通过ROTC Cadets和Midshipmen的行列淘汰了第二次思考，年轻人已经摇摇欲坠，受到Yale Corporation缺乏支持的恐吓。学生身体已经在军事服务和Brewster的共同化改革中被激怒的转动ROTC的结合进入了一个弱势地位。然而，ROTC解雇的原因是真正的框架被公众误解了。仍然是今日，美国人民理解ROTC讨论作为政治化戏剧事实，其从耶鲁的驱逐应被理解为主要是由越南战争的培训推进和遮挡的主要学术冲突。从本质上讲，耶鲁罗茨辩论的争论除了失去曾经是无疑的ROTC友好的机构之外的军队的影响。许多国家和大学高度尊重的耶鲁愿景，并迫切地遵循政府的决定，热切地遵守自己学校的立场。在Brewster撤离ROTC的学术学分之后，Massachusetts理工学院，蒙大拿大学和密苏里州立大学，名称几次，立即发信询问备忘录和文件在决定决定后面提出的备忘录和文件.37之后该大学的宣布，最后一级委托在耶鲁罗茨委托在1972年。在1972年5月，在非活动ROTC计划中只有十个左右的学生在校园的运行设施中没有适当的制服，在校园内完成了练习.38代表的内容大学的一项成就和建筑石头逐渐消失四十年，直到2012年回归。罗茨的离开留下了某些个人苦涩和其他人的欢乐。它叙述了一个关于一系列侧面的故事 - 每次想要责任和司法的原因 - 在一个动荡的时间。未覆盖的是，耶鲁罗茨辩论辩论在现在呈现的战争中阐述了一个事件，现在讲述了更多的真理。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Military review》 |2019年第4期|98-105|共8页
  • 作者

    Andrew Song;

  • 作者单位

    Naval Reserve Officers' Training Corps;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号