...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Military review >Incompatibility and Divorce of Institutions
【24h】

Incompatibility and Divorce of Institutions

机译：机构的不相容与离婚

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To conclude that antiwar rallies did not contribute to ROTC's disappearance is incorrect. The antiwar atmosphere had a substantial role in questioning ROTC, but there is a dichotomy between the role of antiwar protesters and anti-ROTC advocates. Without the encouragement for ROTC's dismissal from various anti-ROTC groups on campus, the training program would have continued unhindered. For the faculty ROTC undermined academia's notion of titles and the definition of departments. ROTC's academic courses competed with classes and majors subsisted by Yale College-professors believed the courses to be threatened or disrespected by ROTC's prohibitions. Along with the academic issue, a collection of minor reasons quickened the end to ROTC. Religious leadership by Coffin trickled second thoughts through the ranks of ROTC cadets and midshipmen, young men already shaken and intimidated by the lack of support from the Yale Corporation. The combination of a student body already uninterested in military service and Brewster's coeducational reform catapulted ROTC into a weak position. What had been the true framework of reasons for ROTC's dismissal, however, was misinterpreted by the public. Still to this day, the American people understand the ROTC discussion as a politicized drama when in fact, its expulsion from Yale should be understood as a mainly apolitical academic conflict propelled and obscured by the tribulations of the Vietnam War. In essence, the Yale ROTC debate had ramifications for the military other than losing what was once an undoubtedly ROTC-friendly institution. Many national colleges and universities highly respected Yale's vision and closely followed the decisions of the administration eagerly to make sense of their own school's stance. In the days after Brewster's withdrawal of ROTC's academic credits, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Montana, and Missouri State University, to name a few, immediately sent letters asking for memos and documents dictating the reasoning behind the presidents decision.37 After the university's announcement, the last class commissioned in Yale ROTC was in 1972. In May 1972, only ten or so students in the inactive ROTC program were completing drills by themselves without proper uniform in a run-down facility off campus.38 What had represented an achievement and building stone for the university faded away for forty years until its return in 2012. The departure of ROTC left certain individuals bitter and others rejoicing. It narrates a story about a collection of sides-each wanting responsibility and justice for their causes-in a turbulent time. Uncovered, the Yale ROTC debate epitomizes an event in a war now presented in more light and now told with more truth.
机译：得出结论，反战集会并未导致ROTC的消失，这是不正确的。反战气氛在质疑ROTC方面起着重要作用，但反战示威者与反ROTC倡导者之间的分歧是二分的。如果不鼓励将ROTC从校园内的各个反ROTC团体中解雇，培训计划将继续畅通无阻。对于教师而言，ROTC破坏了学术界的职称观念和部门定义。 ROTC的学术课程与耶鲁大学教授开设的班级和专业竞争，因为ROTC的禁令威胁或不尊重这些课程。随着学术问题，一系列次要原因促使ROTC的终结。棺材的宗教领导层通过ROTC学员和中年军官的队伍欺骗了第二种思想，由于耶鲁公司缺乏支持，年轻人已经受到震动和恐吓。一个已经对兵役不感兴趣的学生团体与布鲁斯特的男女同校改革相结合，使ROTC陷入了劣势。然而，公众对ROTC被解雇的真正框架是什么，却被误解了。直到今天，美国人民仍将ROTC讨论理解为一种政治化的戏剧，而实际上，将其从耶鲁大学驱逐应理解为主要是一场非政治性的学术冲突，受到越南战争的苦难的推动和掩盖。从本质上讲，耶鲁的ROTC辩论除了失去曾经一度毫无疑问的对ROTC友好的机构之外，对军方来说是一个后果。许多国立高等学校都高度尊重耶鲁大学的远见，并紧追行政当局的决定，以切合自己学校的立场。在布鲁斯特撤回ROTC的学分后的几天里，麻省理工学院，蒙大拿大学和密苏里州立大学（仅举几例）立即发出信函，要求提供备忘录和文件，以阐明总统决定的依据。37大学宣布，耶鲁大学ROTC的最后一堂课是1972年。1972年5月，不活跃的ROTC计划中只有十名左右的学生在校外破旧的设施中没有适当的制服就自己完成了演习。38这所大学的成就和奠基石消失了四十年，直到2012年回归。ROTC的离开使某些人感到痛苦，而其他人则感到欣喜。它讲述了一个故事的故事，说在一个动荡的时期内，双方都希望为自己的事业承担责任和伸张正义。耶鲁ROTC辩论揭露了这场战争的一个缩影，这场战争现在更加清晰地呈现出来，并且现在有了更多的真相。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Military review》 |2019年第4期|98-105|共8页
  • 作者

    Andrew Song;

  • 作者单位

    Naval Reserve Officers' Training Corps;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号