首页> 外文期刊>Minerva >Epistemological, Artefactual and Interactional- Institutional Foundations of Social Impact of Academic Research
【24h】

Epistemological, Artefactual and Interactional- Institutional Foundations of Social Impact of Academic Research

机译:学术研究社会影响力的认识论,人为因素和交互作用-制度基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Because of the gross difficulties in measuring the societal impact of academic research, qualitative approaches have been developed in the last decade mostly based on forms of interaction between university and other societal stakeholders. In this paper, we suggest a framework for qualitative analysis based on the ' distinction between three dimensions of societal impact: epistemological, artefactual and interactive-institutional. The epistemological dimension addresses what new research results and understanding of relevant phenomena have contributed to solving of technological and societal problems. The artefactual dimension comprises analysis of the artefacts, methods, tools and services through the use of which societal impact is realized. Finally, in the interactional-institutional dimension the forms and forums of collaboration between university and other societal actors are explored. The model is elaborated by analyzing the work of three university research groups in different disciplines. The framework may be used in articulating formative and dialogical peer evaluation of research to foster learning and social improvement as well as in evaluation of research proposals and research programs.
机译:由于在衡量学术研究的社会影响方面存在巨大困难,因此在过去的十年中已经开发出定性方法,主要是基于大学与其他社会利益相关者之间的互动形式。在本文中,我们基于“社会影响力的三个维度:认识论,人为因素和互动制度”之间的区别,提出了定性分析的框架。认识论层面涉及哪些新的研究结果和对相关现象的理解为解决技术和社会问题做出了贡献。人工制品的维度包括对人工制品,方法,工具和服务的分析,通过使用这些方法可以实现社会影响。最后,在互动-制度方面,探讨了大学与其他社会参与者之间合作的形式和论坛。通过分析三个不同学科的大学研究小组的工作,对该模型进行了阐述。该框架可用于阐明研究的形成性和对话性同行评估,以促进学习和社会进步,以及评估研究计划和研究计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号