首页> 外文期刊>Minerva >Performing Public Good: The Statecraft of Objective and Optimal FIT
【24h】

Performing Public Good: The Statecraft of Objective and Optimal FIT

机译:表演公众:客观和最佳契合的雕像

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Technoscientific-legal rationality in policy-making is the statecraft of creating a 'factual reality' which in effect co-produces a combined technical and socio-political reality for people and institutions, and at the same time expresses the need for representation in politics. Concentrating on the deliberation proceedings and calculations of the Taiwanese Feed-In Tariff (FIT) Committee deciding on a 'reasonable tariff', this article explores the way that technoscientific knowledge-based deliberation, with tacitly enacted roles and boundaries, seriously constrains the possible forms and meanings of renewable energy (RE) and the notions of public interest emerging from the process. It argues the expert committee which is backed up by expert authority and manifests in a bureaucratic-managerial style is best portrayed as a mechanism of controversy settlement and depoliticisation, by distinguishing the 'core technical issues' from 'the others', and by calculating 'relevant' and 'objective' quantitative factors and values. The deliberation process reflects an incessant intention to purify the decision made by the committee and to eliminate the remaining discretion of the experts from wider visibility, which results in an overwhelming preference for mathematical technicality - the public's 'best interest' is translated into the 'reasonableness' of the FIT, which is largely built on a designed formula for steering tariffs among the sea of uncertainty, by taking the average or median value of alternative FIT calculations. I argue this deliberation is democratically envisioned yet technocratically enacted, aiming to depoliticise the decisions made on tariff rates and thus preventing further controversy.
机译:政策制定的技术 - 法律合理性是制定“事实现实”的雕力,这实际上是共同为人民和机构提供了合并的技术和社会政治现实,同时表达了在政治上代表的必要性。专注于审议议程和计算台湾饲料关税(FIT)委员会决定“合理的关税”,本文探讨了基于技术知识的审议,默默无地颁布的作用和界限,严重限制了可能的形式从过程中出现的可再生能源(RE)和公共利益概念的含义。它认为专家管理局支持的专家委员会,并以官僚主义的管理方式表现出来最好被描绘为争议和解和代表的机制,通过区分“其他”的“核心技术问题”,并通过计算“相关'和“客观”的定量因素和价值观。审议过程反映了净化委员会所作决定并消除专家裁定的裁定的不断意图,从更广泛的知识中导致对数学技术性的压倒偏好 - 公众的“最佳利益”被翻译成“合理性” '适合,这主要建立在不确定的海洋中的指导关税的设计公式中,通过替代拟合计算的平均值或中位数。我认为这项审议是民主的,但技术专门制定了,旨在将关于关税率的决定代替,从而防止进一步争议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号