• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>MUFON UFO Journal >PERCEPTIONS
【24h】

PERCEPTIONS

机译：知觉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It is not surprising that the 60th anniversary of Kenneth Arnold's sighting and of Roswell, within two weeks of each other, bring out the debunkers who get a free ride for the nonsense they are trying to sell. Dear Mr. Van Wynsberghe: I must congratulate you on your article "Sixty Years Later, We're Still Alone," published in The National Post on June 15, 2007. It is the best recent example I have seen of the intellectual bank-ruptcy of the pseudoscience of anti-ufology. You seem to have managed to get just about everything wrong. You did, however, adhere to the 4 basic rules for UFO debunkers: 1. What the public doesn't know, I won't tell them. 2. Don't bother me with the facts, my mind is made up. 3. If you can't attack the data, attack the people; it's a lot easier. And, 4. Do your research by proclamation, because investigation is too much trouble and the public won't know the difference, especially if the article appears in a respected publication.
机译：肯尼思·阿诺德（Kenneth Arnold）和罗斯威尔（Roswell）成立60周年之际，彼此相距两周之久，便带走了骗子，他们免费兜售他们试图出售的废话，这不足为奇。尊敬的范温斯伯格先生：我必须祝贺您发表在2007年6月15日《国家邮报》上的文章“六十年后，我们仍然孤独”。这是我所见过的关于知识分子银行的最近最好的例子：反乌托邦的伪科学的破裂。您似乎设法解决了所有错误。但是，您确实遵守了UFO拆弹程序的4条基本规则：1.公众不知道的事情，我不会告诉他们。 2.不要为事实打扰我，我下定了决心。 3.如果您无法攻击数据，请攻击人员。这要容易得多。并且，4.通过声明进行研究，因为调查太麻烦了，公众也不知道其中的区别，特别是如果该文章出现在受人尊敬的出版物中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号