...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Natural Resources Journal >Resolving Conflict In Non-ideal, Complex Systems: Solutions For The Law-science Breakdown In Environmental And Natural Resource Law
【24h】

Resolving Conflict In Non-ideal, Complex Systems: Solutions For The Law-science Breakdown In Environmental And Natural Resource Law

机译：解决非理想的复杂系统中的冲突：环境与自然资源法中法律科学崩溃的解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court decided a consolidated case concerning the scope of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' jurisdiction to require permits for dredge and fill of wetlands under section 404 of the Clean Water Act, issuing a plurality, two concurrences, and two dissents. Each opinion has a solid legal foundation, yet none truly makes sense if the science of the resource in question is considered. The opinions in Rapanos v. United States illuminate the struggle at the law-science interface. The problem is not due to either a failure in legal reasoning or a failure in scientific methodology if each is viewed in isolation. Instead, the difficulty lies in the complexity that results when the human system is overlain on the environment and in our failure to account for that complexity in the methods that govern natural resources dispute resolution. The primary purpose of this article is to shift the dialogue from its current bifurcated focus on better science or better laws to a focus on the need for a new, integrated approach at the law-science interface. The article concludes by recommending one such approach, based on the experience of the Colorado water courts, that would involve the designation of specialized federal district courts with scientists on staff.
机译：2006年，美国最高法院裁定了一项涉及美国陆军工程兵管辖权范围的合并案，要求根据《清洁水法》第404条要求对疏lands和填充湿地的许可，并颁发了多项，两项同意和两项同意。异议。每种观点都有扎实的法律基础，但如果考虑到所涉资源的科学性，那么任何观点都没有真正意义。 Rapanos诉美国案中的意见阐明了法律与科学界的斗争。如果孤立地看待每个问题，这不是由于法律推理失败或科学方法论失败。取而代之的是，困难在于人类系统覆盖环境所导致的复杂性，以及我们无法在管理自然资源争议解决的方法中考虑到这种复杂性。本文的主要目的是将对话从目前对更好的科学或更好的法律的分歧集中到对法律-科学界需要一种新的，综合方法的关注。本文最后根据科罗拉多州水法院的经验，推荐一种这样的方法，该方法将涉及指定专门的联邦地方法院，由工作人员担任科学家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号