...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>New Political Economy >Resisting Protectionism after the Crisis: Strategic Economic Discourse and the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement
【24h】

Resisting Protectionism after the Crisis: Strategic Economic Discourse and the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement

机译：危机后抵抗贸易保护主义：战略经济话语与欧盟-韩国自由贸易协定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In 2006 the European Commission announced its Global Europe strategy, which proposed pursuing a series of ambitious Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) premised on exchanging the EU's remaining ‘pockets of protection’ for market access. The first of these agreements was signed with South Korea in October 2010. This article asks how the Commission's Directorate-General (DG) for Trade could successfully conclude this agreement in the aftermath of the Financial Crisis. Given a strong mobilisation of protectionists with access to policy-makers, this liberal policy outcome cannot be explained purely in terms of institutional insulation, as in much of the literature on EU trade policy, nor be simply ‘read off’ from the material interests of societal actors. This article, therefore, develops a constructivist framework which broadens our understanding of the power of strategically invoked economic discourses. By developing a novel analytical strategy to determine the intentional invocation of such discourses, it is able to show how DG Trade constructed an ideational imperative for liberalisation in Global Europe, enabling it to overcome opposition to the EU-Korea FTA. Beyond its contribution to constructivist scholarship, this article draws attention to the neglected dimension of ideas in trade policy and highlights the continued purchase of neoliberalism after the crisis.View full textDownload full textKeywordsEuropean Union, trade, strategic discourse, constructivism, protectionism, neoliberalismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.602187
机译：2006年，欧盟委员会宣布了其全球欧洲战略，该战略提出了一系列雄心勃勃的自由贸易协定（FTA），其前提是将欧盟剩余的“保护袋”换成市场准入。这些协议中的第一份已于2010年10月与韩国签署。本文询问，在金融危机之后，委员会贸易总局（DG）如何成功达成该协议。鉴于保护主义的动员和决策者的积极参与，这种自由化的政策结果不能仅仅从制度隔离的角度来解释，就像许多有关欧盟贸易政策的文献一样，也不能简单地从欧盟的政策中“读懂”。社会行为者的实质利益。因此，本文建立了一个建构主义的框架，从而拓宽了我们对战略性经济话语力量的理解。通过制定新颖的分析策略来确定此类话语的有意调用，它可以显示DG Trade如何为全球化欧洲的自由化构建构想，从而使其能够克服对欧盟-韩国FTA的反对。除了对建构主义学术的贡献之外，本文还提请人们注意贸易政策中被忽视的方面，并强调危机后新自由主义的持续购买。查看全文下载全文关键字欧盟，贸易，战略话语，建构主义，保护主义，新自由主义相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}；添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.602187

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号