...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ocean & coastal management >Building legitimacy of the recreational fishing sector in mixed commercial-recreational fisheries
【24h】

Building legitimacy of the recreational fishing sector in mixed commercial-recreational fisheries

机译：在商业-休闲渔业中建立休闲捕鱼部门的合法性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To become legitimate fishery stakeholders alongside government and commercial interests, recreational fisheries must operate in accordance with the rules, principles, or standards established for sustainable fisheries. These rules fall within the following fisheries management processes: (i) assessment of stock status relative to target or reference points, (ii) control of either total fishing effort (input control) or total harvest (output control), and (iii) allocation of the harvest amongst stakeholders. Unfortunately, recreational fisheries are rarely subjected to the same standards as commercial fisheries. Aside from personal conservation ethics, there are no incentives for recreational fishers to meet any standards of catch reporting and assessment, limits on total fishery catch, and accounting for allocated catches. In contrast, commercial fisheries are often required to follow strict standards in each of the three management processes. This paper demonstrates how such differences often contribute to a series of "legitimacy gaps" when compared to commercial fisheries that limit the scope of harvest rights attainable by the recreational sector. We use an urban, recreational-commercial fishery for Dungeness crab (Cancer magister) in British Columbia, Canada, as a case study to demonstrate how discrepancies in requirements and responsibilities between the recreational and commercial sectors limit the scope of harvest rights attainable by the recreational sector. Reducing these discrepancies would help justify the changes to the management framework required to increase recreational access.
机译：为了与政府和商业利益一起成为合法的渔业利益相关者，休闲渔业必须按照为可持续渔业制定的规则，原则或标准开展活动。这些规则属于以下渔业管理程序：（i）评估相对于目标或参考点的种群状况，（ii）控制总捕捞努力（投入控制）或总捕捞量（产出控制），以及（iii）分配利益相关者的收获。不幸的是，休闲渔业很少受到与商业渔业相同的标准的约束。除了个人保护伦理之外，休闲渔民没有任何诱因达到渔获量报告和评估的任何标准，渔业总捕捞量的限制以及分配渔获量的核算。相反，在三个管理流程的每一个中，通常都要求商业渔业遵循严格的标准。本文证明，与商业性渔业相比，这些差异通常会导致一系列“合法性差距”，而商业性渔业则限制了娱乐部门可获得的收获权范围。我们以加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的Dungeness蟹（Cancer magister）的城市娱乐休闲商业渔业为例，以证明娱乐休闲和商业部门之间的要求和责任差异如何限制娱乐休闲可实现的收获权范围部门。减少这些差异将有助于证明增加娱乐活动所需的管理框架的变化。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ocean & coastal management》 |2013年第4期|11-19|共9页
  • 作者

    Cameron J.A. MacKenzie; Sean P. Cox;

  • 作者单位

    School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6;

    School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号