...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ocean development and international law >The Genesis of Article 234 of the UNCLOS
【24h】

The Genesis of Article 234 of the UNCLOS

机译：第234款的未加杉文章的成因

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Article 234 is exceptional regarding its wording and placement in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), as well as in its historical background. The Arctic provision has given rise to divergent interpretations regarding the conditions for invoking it, the limitations on the authority under Article 234, and its spatial scope of application. It has served as a justification for specific legislation adopted by Canada and Russia that has been opposed by the United States. The article, describes as a "textbook example of finding a compromise in international treaty negotiations," was negotiated directly and privately, among these three states during the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III). This article describes the historical background to Article 234 and sheds new light on the negotiating process that led to the adoption of the provision.
机译：第234条关于其关于“联合国海洋法公约”（UNCLOS）以及其历史背景的措辞和安置的特殊。 北极规定对有关调用条件的发散解释，根据第234条规定的权限及其空间范围。 它曾担任加拿大和俄罗斯通过美国反对的具体立法的理由。 本文描述为“在国际条约谈判中发现妥协的教科书示例”，直接和私下地谈判，其中三个联合国大海会议（UNCLOS III）。 本文介绍了第234条第234条的历史背景，并在谈判过程中揭示了导致通过提供的谈判过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号