• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>OECD Papers >DEVELOPMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE: EXPLORING LINKAGES BETWEEN NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND CLIMATE ADAPTATION STRATEGIES
【24h】

DEVELOPMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE: EXPLORING LINKAGES BETWEEN NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND CLIMATE ADAPTATION STRATEGIES

机译：发展与气候变化：探索自然资源管理与气候适应战略之间的联系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

1. The OECD organised an informal expert meeting on the Development and Climate Change Project 13-14 March in Paris. It was attended by about 20 invited experts, 6 government delegates (from both WP/GSP and WP/ENV) and several representatives of relevant inter-governmental organisations. The meeting included experts from both the climate policy community (largely adaptation experts) and from the development community. Participants were enthusiastic about the prospects for OECD contributions to assess, advance understanding of, and strengthen the linkages between climate and development policies, especially through the cross-cutting themes of natural resources management and adaptation policies. 2. The climate and development communities are often distinct and do not necessarily "speak the same language." At a minimum, the project should advance an understanding between these two audiences and begin to establish a common platform for action in areas where the two sets of policy objectives intersect. An example of where progress seems likely is in the acknowledgement by both communities of the importance of factoring in climate change impacts and vulnerabilities when planning for development, with applications ranging from building institutions for better governance to re-orienting specific investments in physical infrastructure. 3. A number of real differences in perspectives exist among the two communities. For example, development policy interests tend to be driven by national demands (or "demand-driven"), whereas the climate change community tends to approach the policy problem from the supply side (e.g. policy packages involving support from industrialised countries to help developing countries adapt). Yet, the funds available to support adaptation will probably be less than what would be required to successfully limit vulnerability to climate change in any one locality or, more generally, across developing countries as a whole. A more powerful and cost-efficient solution over the longer term is likely therefore to be integrating adaptation (including the strengthening of adaptive capacity) into core development strategies. 4. Given that climate change is expected to affect the poorest developing countries relatively hard, a number of key questions emerge for development co-operation officials and their counter-parts in countries: 4.1. How to enhance adaptation or adaptive capacity1 through normal development plans and projects? 4.2. What are the priorities for investment in adaptation or adaptive capacity? 4.3. How should such priorities be determined by developing countries and donor communities?
机译：1.经合组织于3月13日至14日在巴黎组织了一次关于发展与气候变化项目的非正式专家会议。约20名受邀专家，6名政府代表（来自WP / GSP和WP / ENV）以及相关政府间组织的几名代表出席了会议。会议包括来自气候政策界（主要是适应性专家）和发展界的专家。与会者对经合发组织为评估，增进对气候与发展政策之间的联系的评估，进一步了解和加强其联系的前景充满热情，特别是通过自然资源管理和适应政策的跨领域主题。 2.气候和发展社区通常是截然不同的，不一定“讲相同的语言”。至少，该项目应增进这两个受众之间的理解，并开始在这两组政策目标相交的领域中建立一个共同的行动平台。两个社区都承认在规划发展时考虑到气候变化影响和脆弱性的重要性，这似乎是可能取得进展的一个例子，其应用范围从建立更好的治理机构到重新定向物理基础设施的特定投资。 3.两个社区之间在观点上存在许多实际差异。例如，发展政策利益往往由国家需求驱动（或“需求驱动”），而气候变化界则倾向于从供应方着手解决政策问题（例如，涉及工业化国家支持发展中国家的一揽子政策方案）适应）。但是，可用于支持适应的资金可能会少于成功地限制任何一个地方或更普遍地整个发展中国家的气候变化脆弱性所需的资金。因此，从长远来看，一种更强大且更具成本效益的解决方案可能会将适应（包括增强适应能力）纳入核心发展战略。 4.鉴于预计气候变化将对最贫穷的发展中国家造成相对较大的影响，因此，对于发展合作官员及其国家对口部门而言，出现了一些关键问题：4.1。如何通过正常的发展计划和项目来增强适应能力或适应能力1？ 4.2。适应或适应能力方面的投资重点是什么？ 4.3。发展中国家和捐助界应如何确定这些优先事项？

著录项

  • 来源
    《OECD Papers》 |2004年第1期|p.309.1309.3-309.37|共36页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 f;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号