...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Organization Studies >From 'History as Told' to 'History as Experienced': Contextualizing the Uses of the Past
【24h】

From 'History as Told' to 'History as Experienced': Contextualizing the Uses of the Past

机译：从“被告知的历史”到“被体验的历史”：情境化过去的使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Research has made great strides in understanding how and why organizational actors use the past. So far, scholars have largely focused the level of analysis on the organization, without exploring the intertwined nature of historical claim-making with the organizational field or society at large. This article extends the status quo by conceptualizing the role of context for organizational uses-of-the-past. It identifies three key aspects of context that shape how history contributes to the social construction of reality: the existence of multiple audiences, the landscape of pre-existing historical narratives and the experience of social practices giving credibility to historical claims. By analysing the historical case of German business in colonial India, the paper makes three broader claims that could move research toward a more contextualized conception of the uses-of-the-past: (i) historical claims are validated in a continuous dialogue with multiple audiences; (ii) they revise previously existing narratives by critiquing or 'outpasting', i.e. invoking earlier origins; (iii) they often result in 'rhetorical frictions' that require continuous and skilful history revisions to mitigate emerging conflicts in their reception. By contextualizing the uses-of-the-past in this way, the paper moves beyond 'hypermuscular' organizational actors bending history to their will and foregrounds the situated nature of historical rhetoric.
机译：研究在理解组织参与者如何以及为什么利用过去方面取得了长足的进步。到目前为止，学者们主要将分析的层次集中在组织上，而没有探索历史主张与组织领域或整个社会的交织本质。本文通过概念化组织过去使用的作用来扩展现状。它确定了塑造历史如何对现实的社会建构做出贡献的三个关键方面：多重受众的存在，既有历史叙事的景观以及赋予历史主张可信性的社会实践经验。通过分析德国企业在印度殖民地的历史案例，本文提出了三个更广泛的主张，这些主张可以使研究朝着更贴近过去的用途的概念发展：（i）历史主张在与多个人的持续对话中得到验证听众（ii）他们通过批判或“超越”（即引用较早的起源）来修改以前的叙述； （iii）它们经常导致“修辞冲突”，需要不断，熟练地修改历史记录，以减轻在接收中出现的冲突。通过以这种方式对过去的使用进行情境化，本文超越了将历史屈服于意愿的“超肌肉”组织角色，并展望了历史修辞的本质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号