• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Oryx >Tilting at wildlife: reconsidering human-wildlife conflict
【24h】

Tilting at wildlife: reconsidering human-wildlife conflict

机译：倾斜野生动植物：重新考虑人与野生生物之间的冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Conflicts between people over wildlife are widespread and damaging to both the wildlife and people involved. Such issues are often termed human-wildlife conflicts. We argue that this term is misleading and may exacerbate the problems and hinder resolution. A review of 100 recent articles on human-wildlife conflicts reveals that 97 were between conservation and other human activities, particularly those associated with livelihoods. We suggest that we should distinguish between human-wildlife impacts and human-human conflicts and be explicit about the different interests involved in conflict. Those representing conservation interests should not only seek technical solutions to deal with the impacts but also consider their role and objectives, and focus on strategies likely to deliver long-term solutions for the benefit of biodiversity and the people involved.
机译：人们之间在野生动植物方面的冲突十分普遍，对野生动植物和所涉人员均造成损害。这些问题通常被称为人类与野生动物的冲突。我们认为该术语具有误导性，可能加剧问题并阻碍解决。对最近关于人类与野生动物冲突的100篇文章进行的审查显示，有97篇是在保护与其他人类活动之间的，特别是与生计有关的活动之间。我们建议我们应该区分人类与野生动植物的影响和人与人之间的冲突，并明确冲突中涉及的不同利益。那些代表保护利益的人不仅应寻求应对这些影响的技术解决方案，还应考虑其作用和目标，并着重于可能为生物多样性和相关人员带来长期解决方案的战略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号