• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Pedagogy, Culture & Society >‘Soft’ pedagogy? The invention of a ‘feminine’ pedagogy as a cause of educational crises
【24h】

‘Soft’ pedagogy? The invention of a ‘feminine’ pedagogy as a cause of educational crises

机译：“软”教学法？导致教育危机的“女性”教学法的发明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Every now and then the feminisation of the teaching force is put forth as a barrier to reduce educational equality between the sexes. The feminisation of education is supposed to have a negative impact on boys’ achievement, causing educational as well as behavioural problems. It is not just boys who allegedly suffer; over the years, the feminisation of education has been held responsible for countless other education-related problems and social crises. In the latest parliamentary and public discussions in the Netherlands, the failure of educational reforms in the second half of the twenty-first century is attributed to the feminisation of education. This time it is not too many female teachers, but a so-called ‘female pedagogy’ that is to blame. It is assumed that women teachers have a different (‘soft’) approach to methodology, didactics and pedagogy than their male counterparts. We have sought historical evidence for this assumption by examining the rise and development of pedagogy within the teaching profession, using a content analysis of the professional association journal for the (teaching of) modern languages in secondary schooling.View full textDownload full textKeywordspedagogy, feminisation, education, content analysis, educational reformRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2011.607837
机译：时不时地提出教师队伍的女性化是阻碍男女两性平等的障碍。教育的女性化应该对男孩的成就产生负面影响，导致教育以及行为上的问题。据称遭受痛苦的不仅仅是男孩。多年来，教育的女性化已被归咎于无数其他与教育有关的问题和社会危机。在荷兰最新的议会和公开讨论中，二十一世纪后半叶教育改革的失败归因于教育的女性化。这次不是太多的女老师，而是应该怪的是所谓的“女性教学法”。假定女教师在方法，教学方法和教学法上与男教师有不同（“软”）的方法。我们通过对教学专业中教学法的兴起和发展进行了调查，并使用针对中学阶段现代语言（教学）的专业协会期刊的内容分析，研究了这一假设的历史证据。查看全文下载全文关键字关键字教学法，女性化，教育，内容分析，教育改革相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra -4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2011.607837

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号