...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Pennsylvania journal of environmental litigation >IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
【24h】

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

机译：在美国宾夕法尼亚州中部地区法院

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Final Agreement is not entitled to a statutory contribution bar because it is neither an administrative nor judicially approved settlement for purposes of Section 113(f)(2). Furthermore, because Section 113(f)(2) is inapplicable, Section 113(f)(1) gives the court authority to allocate response costs among liable parties by using such equitable factors as it deems appropriate. Because the equitable method for allocation remains at issue, it is not clear whether LMC may be jointly and severally liable under Section 107(a) for more than its share of remediation costs incurred by PADEP. Thus, if judgment is granted in favor of the United States on LMC's properly asserted Section 113(f)(1) contribution claim and it is ultimately determined that LMC is a responsible party for purposes of Section 107(a), LMC will be unable to reduce its liability through Section 113(f)(1) allocation. Accordingly, because PADEP's Section 107 claim seeks to hold LMC jointly and severally liable for all remediation costs incurred for cleanup of the Site, the record does not establish that the United States is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Therefore, the court will deny the motion for summary judgment without prejudice to the United States's right to seek summary judgment once an appropriate allocation method is established.
机译：《最终协议》无权获得法定分摊金，因为就第113（f）（2）条而言，它既不是行政协议，也不是司法批准的协议。此外，由于第113（f）（2）条不适用，因此第113（f）（1）条赋予法院权力，通过使用其认为适当的公平因素在责任方之间分配响应成本。由于公平的分配方法仍然存在争议，因此尚不清楚LMC是否可能根据第107（a）条承担连带赔偿责任，而不是其应承担的PADEP补救费用中的份额。因此，如果就LMC正确主张的第113（f）（1）条供款主张授予美国有利的判决，并且最终确定LMC是第107（a）条的负责方，则LMC将无法通过第113（f）（1）条分配来减少其责任。相应地，由于PADEP的第107节索赔要求对LMC承担连带赔偿责任，因此，记录不构成美国依法享有判决的权利。因此，一旦建立了适当的分配方法，法院将拒绝进行简易判决的动议，而不会影响美国寻求简易判决的权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号