• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on global development and technology >International Organizations as 'Experts' on Indicators and Measurements: Understanding the Politics of oecd's Technocratization of Innovation
【24h】

International Organizations as 'Experts' on Indicators and Measurements: Understanding the Politics of oecd's Technocratization of Innovation

机译：国际组织作为指标和度量的“专家”：了解OECD的创新技术官僚化的政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

International Organizations ( IO s) act as powerful actors in construction and constitution of knowledge. This role becomes even more critical as new agendas emerge for global governance in a multi-actor world, making the process of knowledge generation and dissemination even more contentious. One of the tools to exercise such organizational power is through rankings and ratings. These indicators, designed scientifically using expert knowledge, are increasingly being used as tools of statecraft. As good governance synonymizes good business, a technocratic lens has become a preferred practice of present day policymaking. This article attempts to explore IO s’ role as authoritative knowledge actors, designing indicators for governmentality and policy advocacy. It particularly looks at OECD ’s ‘utilitarian’ measurement of innovation based on a technocratic approach.
机译：国际组织（IO）在知识的构造和构成方面起着强大的作用。随着在多主体世界中出现全球治理的新议程，这一作用变得更加关键，这使得知识的产生和传播过程更具争议性。行使这种组织能力的工具之一是通过排名和评级。这些使用专家知识科学设计的指标正越来越多地被用作治国之道。由于善政是良好企业的代名词，技术官僚主义已成为当今决策的首选做法。本文试图探索IO作为权威性知识参与者的角色，设计用于政府和政策倡导的指标。它特别着眼于经合组织基于技术官僚主义方法的“功利主义”创新度量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号