It is argued here that large-scale organization and networked computing enable new divisions of communicative work aimed at shaping the'/> The Communicative Work of Organizations in Shaping Argumentative Realities
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophy & technology >The Communicative Work of Organizations in Shaping Argumentative Realities
【24h】

The Communicative Work of Organizations in Shaping Argumentative Realities

机译：塑造辩论现实的组织的沟通工作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract It is argued here that large-scale organization and networked computing enable new divisions of communicative work aimed at shaping the content, direction, and outcomes of societal conversations. The challenge for argumentation theory and practice lies in attending to these new divisions of communicative work in constituting contemporary argumentative realities. Goffman’s conceptualization of participation frameworks and production formats are applied to articulate the communicative work of organizations afforded by networked computing that invents and innovates argument in all of its senses—as product, process, and procedure. Communicative work, however, may be scaffolding argumentative contexts and practices that are quite different than what has constituted past argumentative realities. The computerization of argument happens as organizations invent and innovate argument practice relative to the demands and opportunities of interorganizational communication. The cases and examples examined here suggest that argument practice is evolving around the logic of conversation and the principle of personalization. The analysis challenges argumentation theory to seriously engage with the construction of communicative contexts and the realization of ideas about disagreement management in organizational practice and information infrastructures. Directions for integrating insights from a design perspective on argument with insights from organizational and information systems theory are proposed for coming to terms with an era of large-scale organization and computerization, in particular the evolution of argument practice, the inscription of argument in the built environment, and the absorption of socio-cultural argument practices by organizations and computation.
机译： Abstract 这里争论的是，大规模的组织和网络计算实现了交流工作的新划分，旨在塑造社会对话的内容，方向和结果。论证理论和实践的挑战在于参与沟通工作的这些新领域，以构成当代论证现实。 Goffman对参与框架和生产格式的概念化被用于阐明发明和创新论据的网络计算所提供的组织的沟通工作。从所有意义上讲-产品，过程和程序。但是，交流工作可能会在争论的情境和实践中搭建支架，这与过去的争论现实构成了很大的差异。论据的计算机化发生在组织相对于组织间交流的需求和机会进行发明和创新论证实践时。这里讨论的案例和例子表明，辩论实践是围绕对话逻辑和个性化原则发展的。该分析向论证理论提出挑战，要求其认真参与交际情境的建设以及组织实践和信息基础架构中有关分歧管理的思想的实现。为了适应大规模组织化和计算机化的时代，特别是论证实践的演变，论证在建筑中的铭刻，提出了将论证的设计观点与组织和信息系统理论的见解相集成的方向。环境，以及组织和计算对社会文化争论实践的吸收。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号