• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Knowledge Technology & Policy >Theory and Policy in Online Privacy
【24h】

Theory and Policy in Online Privacy

机译：在线隐私的理论与政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Laurence Tribe, Tyler Professor of Constitutional Law at the Harvard University Law School, has proposed a Twenty-Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution which would do for cyberspace what the Ninth Amendment did for protecting rights and espousing values not expressly stated in its text. That is, it would render applicable to the new technological terrain the constitutional protections developed during its construction—thereby acknowledging the reality of originally unspecified rights held by individuals. As proposed, it would state: "This Constitution's protections for the freedoms of speech, press, petition, and assembly, and its protections against unreasonable searches and seizures and the deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, shall be construed as fully applicable without regard to the technological method or medium through which information content is generated, stored, altered, transmitted, or controlled"(Tribe, 1991). While it is unknown how much legitimacy such a proposal is given, its contents speak volumes about what is apparently imperative to constrain unethical and infringing behavior by corporations and organizations online.
机译：哈佛大学法学院泰勒宪法法学教授劳伦斯·特里伯（Laurence Tribe）提出了《美国宪法》第二十七条修正案，该修正案将对《网络宪法》起到保护第九条修正案所保护的权利和拥护其案文中未明确阐明的价值观的作用。也就是说，它将使在构造过程中制定的宪法保护适用于新的技术领域，从而承认个人最初拥有的未指定权利的现实。如提议的那样，它应指出：“本宪法对言论，新闻，请愿和集会自由的保护，以及针对不合理的搜查和扣押以及在没有适当法律程序的情况下剥夺生命，自由或财产的保护，应予以保护。解释为完全适用，而与产生，存储，更改，传输或控制信息内容所采用的技术方法或媒介无关”（Tribe，1991）。虽然尚不清楚该提案的合法性，但其内容充分说明了必须采取哪些措施来限制企业和组织在线上的不道德行为和侵权行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号