• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophia >Reason and Religion in Rawls: Voegelin’s Challenge
【24h】

Reason and Religion in Rawls: Voegelin’s Challenge

机译：罗尔斯的理性与宗教：沃格林的挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article argues that we must abandon the still predominant view of modernity as based upon a separation between the secular and the religious - a “separation” which is allegedly now brought into question again in “postsecularity”. It is more meaningful to start from the premise that religion and politics have always co-existed in various fields of tension and will continue to do so. The question then concerns the natures and modalities of this tension, and how one can articulate a publically grounded reason with reference to it. It will first be argued that this question cannot be articulated, let alone fully answered, from the position developed by John Rawls. A different approach will then be developed, building on the writings of Eric Voegelin. This involves a much more serious engagement with the classical tradition in thought and philosophy than found in Rawls. It also implies much more than a “pragmatic” recognition of religion as a possible source for overlapping consensus, since for Voegelin a true, balanced rationality can only depart from an experientially grounded encounter with the transcendent.
机译：本文认为，我们必须摒弃基于世俗与宗教之间的分离的现代性主流观点，即所谓的“分离”，这种分离现在在“后世俗性”中再次受到质疑。从宗教和政治在各种紧张局势中始终并存的前提出发，这将更有意义，并将继续如此。然后，这个问题涉及到这种紧张关系的性质和形式，以及人们如何能够参照这种紧张状态阐明一种基于公共理由的理由。首先要论证的是，约翰·罗尔斯（John Rawls）提出的立场不能清楚地阐明这个问题，更不用说充分回答了。然后，将基于Eric Voegelin的著作开发出一种不同的方法。与罗尔斯所发现的相比，这涉及对思想和哲学方面的古典传统的更为认真的参与。这也不仅仅是对宗教作为重叠共识的可能来源的“务实”承认，因为对于Voegelin而言，真实，​​平衡的理性只能脱离与先验者经验性的相遇。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号