...
首页> 外文期刊>Plane & pilot >Aerobatics, Judgment And Stupidity
【24h】

Aerobatics, Judgment And Stupidity

机译:特技飞行,判断力和愚蠢

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A few minutes ago, I stumbled across a YouTube video of a Cirrus accident caused by attempting to do a roll at 200 feet. The ensuing thread of reader comments brushed right past the aerobatics and centered immediately on the accident rate of the Cirrus and how dangerous they claim it to be (the airplane isn't dangerous, but some of its pilots are). Well, I have a news flash for anyone seeing that video: An aileron roll at 200 feet in any airplane, be it a Pitts Special, Extra or Cirrus, is damned dangerous. In fact, it's crazy dangerous. Obviously, the really dangerous component in this accident, wasn't the airplane, but the pilot's total lack of judgment. And you can't teach, engineer or legislate judgment. Stupid is as stupid does.
机译:几分钟前,我偶然发现了一段YouTube视频,内容是试图在200英尺高空翻滚引起的Cirrus事故。随之而来的读者评论波及特技飞行,并立即关注了卷云的事故发生率及其声称的危险程度(飞机并不危险,但其中一些飞行员却是危险的)。好吧,我对所有看到该视频的人都有一个新闻快报:在任何飞机上,无论是Pitts Special,Extra还是Cirrus,副翼在200英尺高处都是危险的。实际上,这是疯狂的危险。显然,这次事故中真正危险的部分不是飞机,而是飞行员完全缺乏判断力。而且您不能教授,设计或立法判断。愚蠢是愚蠢的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Plane & pilot》 |2013年第11期|7473|共2页
  • 作者

    BUDD DAVISSON;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号