...
首页> 外文期刊>Policing >Exploring the limits of collaboration in community policing A direct comparison of police and citizen views
【24h】

Exploring the limits of collaboration in community policing A direct comparison of police and citizen views

机译:探索社区警务合作的局限性直接比较警察和公民的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide direct comparisons between the views of citizens and officers within a jurisdiction that has been largely influenced by the community-oriented policing movement. Comparisons between police and citizen views are specifically made in terms of: the relative importance of crime problems in the jurisdiction; the value of community policing programs; overall satisfaction with the performance of the department; and strategies designed to improve the performance of the department. Design/methodology/approach - The methodology of the study is officer and citizen surveys. Findings - Officers and citizens significantly differed in their assessment of the importance of specific crime problems in the jurisdiction, the value of community policing programs, the degree to which they were satisfied with the performance of the department, and their assessment of improvement strategies. These differences are discussed within the context of previous literature that has focused on the implementation and continued acceptance of community policing. Research limitations/implications - Findings are derived from surveys conducted in one jurisdiction. Findings are limited to the degree that citizen/officer views within this jurisdiction differ from those found elsewhere. Originality/value - The study utilizes seldom-used concurrent surveys of officers and citizens within a single jurisdiction. The method allows for the direct comparison of police and citizen views. Thus, this paper provides evidence regarding the feasibility of collaboration between police and citizens, and the continued viability of community-oriented strategies.
机译:目的-本文的目的是在一个主要受面向社区的警务运动影响的辖区内的公民和官员的观点之间进行直接比较。警察和公民观点之间的比较是专门根据以下方面进行的:犯罪问题在辖区中的相对重要性;社区警务计划的价值;对部门绩效的总体满意度;和旨在提高部门绩效的策略。设计/方法/方法-研究方法是官员和公民调查。调查结果-官员和公民对辖区内特定犯罪问题的重要性,社区警务计划的价值,对部门绩效的满意程度以及对改进策略的评估存在很大差异。这些差异是在以前的文献中讨论的,这些文献集中于社区警务的实施和持续接受。研究局限性/含义-研究结果来自在一个司法管辖区进行的调查。调查结果仅限于本辖区内的公民/官员观点与其他地方的观点不同的程度。原创性/价值-该研究利用了单个司法管辖区中很少使用的官员和公民同时调查。该方法可以直接比较警察和公民的观点。因此,本文提供了有关警察与公民之间合作的可行性以及面向社区的战略的持续可行性的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号