...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Policy Studies >Policy transfer, contagion effects and intra-party reform
【24h】

Policy transfer, contagion effects and intra-party reform

机译：政策转移，传染效应和党内改革

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article examines the extent to which the Australian Labor Party (ALP) engaged in a process of policy transfer, learning from the UK Labour Party, when it reformed its federal leadership selection process in 2013. Bringing together insights from both the public policy and party organisations literature, the article develops an empirical framework for identifying instances of policy transfer (or contagion effects) that consists of three criteria: intention, motivation and implementation, which can examined through various types of empirical data (including interviews, documentary, and network analysis). Applying this framework to the ALP reforms, the article concludes that while it is possible to see evidence of a general shift to a similar, more inclusive selection process, policy transfer is more difficult to substantiate. There were clear differences in the specifics of how the process would work, and a temporal disjoint between when actors sought information about UK practices and when the reforms actually occurred.
机译：本文考察了澳大利亚工党（ALP）在2013年改革联邦领导层甄选程序时向英国工党学习的程度，以探讨政策转移过程。汇集了公共政策和党派的见解在组织文献中，本文建立了一个用于确定政策转移实例（或传染效应）的经验框架，该框架由三个标准组成：意图，动机和实施，可以通过各种类型的经验数据（包括访谈，文献和网络分析）进行检查）。将这一框架应用于ALP改革后，文章得出的结论是，虽然有可能看到普遍转向类似，更具包容性的process选过程的证据，但政策转移却难以成立。在流程如何运作的细节方面，以及当参与者寻求有关英国惯例的信息与改革何时真正发生之间的时间上的脱节，存在明显差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号