• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Policy Studies >Policy transfer: coining of age and learning from the experience
【24h】

Policy transfer: coining of age and learning from the experience

机译：政策转移：年龄的创造和经验的积累

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Policy transfer research has been something of a growth industry, reflected in the fact that Google Scholar identifies 17 articles on the subject with more than 100 citations. Of course, as an earlier issue of Policy Studies indicated, the concept and its use have not gone unquestioned. However, the contributors to this volume, for the most part, argue that the study of policy transfer has matured significantly over the last two decades. In order to substantiate this point, we engage here with the article by McCann and Ward which begins this volume. It is an excellent and important example of such a critique, but, in our view, they are a trifle unfair about what they see as the 'mainstream', political science approach to the study of policy transfer. As such, we briefly outline McCann and Ward's critique, before considering the later articles in this collection which indicate how these critiques have been, and are being, addressed in the mainstream policy transfer literature. Subsequently, we briefly consider the ontological and epistemological positions which underpin the differences between the approaches of McCann and Ward and the mainstream literature.
机译：政策转移研究一直处于蓬勃发展的行业，这反映在以下事实上：Google学术搜索针对该主题的17篇文章被引用了100多次。当然，正如前期《政策研究》所指出的那样，这一概念及其用法并非毫无疑问。但是，对该书的贡献者大多认为，在过去的二十年中，对政策转移的研究已经相当成熟。为了证实这一点，我们在这里着眼于McCann和Ward的文章，该文章开始于此。这是这种批评的一个极好的和重要的例子，但是，在我们看来，他们对于他们认为是政策转移研究的“主流”政治学方法并不公平。因此，在考虑本集后面的文章之前，我们简要概述了麦肯和沃德的批评，这些文章指出了主流政策转移文献中这些批评的过去和现在。随后，我们简要地考虑了本体论和认识论立场，这些立场支撑了麦肯和沃德的研究方法与主流文学之间的差异。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Policy Studies》 |2012年第6期|477-481|共5页
  • 作者

    David Marsh; Mark Evans;

  • 作者单位

    School of Sociology, Australia National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia,ANZSOG Institute for Governance, University of Canberra, Bryce, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia;

    School of Sociology, Australia National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia,ANZSOG Institute for Governance, University of Canberra, Bryce, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    policy transfer; public policy; ontology; policy learning;

    机译：政策转移;公共政策;本体政策学习;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号