首页> 外文期刊>Policy Studies >'Blaming the victim' vis-a-vis child-focused Western law: implications of evidence-based policy-making for the rescue of Black families
【24h】

'Blaming the victim' vis-a-vis child-focused Western law: implications of evidence-based policy-making for the rescue of Black families

机译:相对于以儿童为中心的西方法律“责备受害者”:循证决策对营救黑人家庭的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

'Blaming the victim' policies remain largely intact under the facade of family law and policy construction. Based on empirical evidence, lack of employment for Black men is a major factor in their inability to sustain the Black family as a functional unit. The existence of child-focused family laws has had a devastating effect upon the construction of family policies vis-a-vis Black men. Evidence-based policy-making (EBPM) is intended to provide a means for creating legislation independent of politics. EBPM is predicated on the most rigorous scientific evidence available from recognized experts in relevant fields. Accordingly, policy-makers loyal to the Black family may simultaneously rescue its children and play a pivotal role in its viability.
机译:在家庭法和政策建设的背景下,“责备受害者”的政策在很大程度上保持不变。根据经验证据,黑人男子缺乏就业是他们无法维持黑人家庭为职能部门的一个主要因素。以儿童为中心的家庭法的存在,对针对黑人的家庭政策的建立产生了毁灭性的影响。循证政策制定(EBPM)旨在为创建独立于政治的立法提供一种手段。 EBPM的依据是相关领域公认的专家提供的最严格的科学证据。因此,忠于黑人家庭的决策者可以同时营救其子女,并在其生存能力中发挥关键作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号