• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Professional safety >OSHA & Ergonomics
【24h】

OSHA & Ergonomics

机译：OSHA和人体工程学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Enforcement of ergonomic hazards under the General Duty Clause has a long history with mixed results. The fourth prong of the GDC criteria-feasibility of abatement-will likely remain the stumbling block for successful prosecution. One potential advantage of this approach is that GDC enforcement can cover all workplaces-including general industry workplaces, construction, maritime and agriculture-whereas the rescinded standard covered only general industry. Whether the agency will be able to expend adequate resources to educate its compliance officers so that true hazards can be identified and cited with the necessary precision remains to be seen. If history is any indication, prosecution through the GDC will be a long, costly process. Moreover, it delegates to the OSHRC power to define what constitutes recognized ergonomic hazards through case law development. One can only hope that such decisions will be carefully drafted because of their impact on the future practice of safety and health and on the lives of American workers.
机译：根据《一般责任条款》实施人机工程学危害的历史由来已久。 GDC标准的第四个分支-减排的可行性-可能仍然是成功起诉的绊脚石。这种方法的一个潜在优势是，GDC执法可以涵盖所有工作场所，包括一般工业场所，建筑，海运和农业，而废除的标准仅涵盖一般工业。该机构是否将能够花费足够的资源来培训其合规人员，以便能够以必要的精度识别和列举真正的危害。如果有历史记录，通过GDC进行起诉将是一个漫长而昂贵的过程。此外，它授权OSHRC通过判例法制定来定义什么构成公认的人体工程学危害。人们只能希望，由于这些决定会对未来的安全与健康惯例以及对美国工人的生活产生影响，因此将谨慎起草。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号