...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Psychoanalytic Dialogues >Deeper, Wider: Some Comments on the Gill/Bromberg Correspondence
【24h】

Deeper, Wider: Some Comments on the Gill/Bromberg Correspondence

机译：更深，更广：关于吉尔/布朗伯格信函的一些评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The letters compose an interesting historical and theoretical exchange (1979-83). It strikes me that, rather than converging on the issue, they were passing in the night. Gill, a very informed Freud scholar, was moving away from his doctrinaire position, shifting his percepts of transference from a containment to a more fluid and vital interaction but still valiantly making an effort to integrate the classic and interpersonal position. Bromberg was moving in an entirely different direction. Gill remained rooted in the linked concepts of repression/regression: Bromberg fostered the concept of dissociation. They were talking across a paradigmatic gap.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2011.580683
机译：这些信件构成了有趣的历史和理论交流（1979-83年）。令我惊讶的是，他们没有在这个问题上纠缠不休，而是在黑夜中经过。吉尔（Gill）是一位非常有见识的弗洛伊德学者，他正在远离教条学的立场，将转移的观念从遏制转变为更加流畅和生动的互动，但仍在努力地整合经典和人际关系。布隆伯格正朝着完全不同的方向前进。吉尔仍然根植于压抑/回归的联系概念：布隆伯格（Bromberg）提出了分离的概念。他们正在谈论一种范式的差距。 “，pubid：” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2011.580683

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号