...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychoanalytic Dialogues >Remembering and Responsibility: Commentary on Paper by Gillian Straker
【24h】

Remembering and Responsibility: Commentary on Paper by Gillian Straker

机译:记住和责任:吉莉安·史翠克的纸上评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This discussion relates Gillian Straker's work on the South African apartheid archives to Rawlsian social ethics, and to Margalit's ethics of memory, with special emphasis on her “bystander/beneficiary” formulation. From a psychoanalytic point of view, it questions whether Brombergian dissociation adequately accounts for the pre-dissociative self-loss described by some of the archive participants. Returning to ethics, it invokes Margalit's concept of the moral witness.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2011.629561
机译:这次讨论将吉莉安·斯特拉克(Gillian Straker)在南非种族隔离档案上的工作与罗尔斯的社会伦理学以及马尔加里特的记忆伦理学联系起来,并特别强调了她的“旁观者/受益者”表述。从心理分析的角度,它质疑布朗伯格式的解离是否足以解释某些档案参与者所描述的解离前的自我损失。回到道德,它引用了玛格丽特的道德证人的概念。查看全文下载全文相关的变量addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon, digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2011.629561

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号