Reply to Commentary by Juliet Mitchell: Siblings in Clinical Work

Vivian Dent

首页> 外文期刊>Psychoanalytic Dialogues >Reply to Commentary by Juliet Mitchell: Siblings in Clinical Work

【24h】

Reply to Commentary by Juliet Mitchell: Siblings in Clinical Work

机译：回复朱丽叶·米切尔的评论：临床工作中的兄弟姐妹

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Juliet Mitchell's wide-ranging theory of lateral dynamics proposes that displacement by a sibling, real or potential, upends a small child's identity and position as “the baby.” This trauma gives rise to the complex process of forming a personal identity in a world of similar others. The impact of lateral relationships should therefore have major implications for analytic practice. Traditionally, however, psychoanalysis has treated siblings mainly as rivals for parental love and attention, not as unconsciously meaningful beings in their own right. This paper describes some ways that Mitchell's theory has inspired clinical interventions that would not have come into focus through a lens of parent-child relatedness.

机译：朱丽叶·米切尔（Juliet Mitchell）广泛的横向动力学理论提出，通过同胞（无论是真实的还是潜在的）进行的位移会颠覆小孩子作为“婴儿”的身份和地位。这种创伤导致在相似世界中形成个人身份的复杂过程。因此，横向关系的影响应对分析实践产生重大影响。然而，传统上，心理分析主要将兄弟姐妹视为父母对父母的关爱和关注的对手，而不是无意识地有意义的存在。本文描述了米切尔理论激发临床干预的一些方式，而这些干预本来不会通过亲子相关性的镜头而引起关注。

著录项

来源
《Psychoanalytic Dialogues》 |2009年第2期|171-174|共4页
作者
Vivian Dent;
展开▼
作者单位

Access Institute, California Pacific Medical Center, and the San Francisco Center for Psychoanalysis,;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. The Bright Forms Shining in the Dark: Juliet Mitchell's Theory of Sibling Dynamics as Illuminated in A. S. Byatt's “The Chinese Lobster” [J] . Vivian Dent Psychoanalytic Dialogues . 2009,第2期

机译：明亮的形式在黑暗中发光：A。S. Byatt的《中国龙虾》中的朱丽叶·米切尔（Juliet Mitchell）的同级动力学理论
2. In Reply: Commentary: Deep Brain Stimulation as Clinical Innovation: An Ethical and Organizational Framework to Sustain Deliberations About Psychiatric Deep Brain Stimulation [J] . Fins Joseph J. Clinical neurosurgery. . 2017,第6期

机译：在答复中：评论：作为临床创新的深部脑刺激：维持有关精神科深部脑刺激的审议的道德和组织框架
3. In Reply: Commentary: Deep Brain Stimulation as Clinical Innovation: An Ethical and Organizational Framework to Sustain Deliberations About Psychiatric Deep Brain Stimulation [J] . Fins Joseph J. Neurosurgery . 2017,第6期

机译：在回复：评论：深脑刺激作为临床创新：伦理和组织框架，维持精神病深脑刺激的审议
4. Making Sense of Clinical Laboratory Results: An Analysis, of Questions and Replies in a Social QA Community [C] . Zhan Zhang, Yu Lu, Caleb Wilson, MEDINFO . 2019

机译：临床实验室结果感：在社会问答社区中的分析，问题和答复
5. Sibling structure and gender inequality: Assessing gender variation in the effects of sibling structure on housework performance, education, and occupation [D] . Wang, Yan 2013

机译：同级结构和性别不平等：评估同级结构对家务表现，教育和职业的影响中的性别差异
6. Toward Establishing Internal Validity for Correlated Gene Expression Measures in Imaging Genomics of Functional Networks: Why Distance Corrections and External Face Validity Alone Fall Short. Reply to Distance Is Not Everything in Imaging Genomics of Functional Networks: Reply to a Commentary on Correlated Gene Expression Supports Synchronous Activity in Brain Networks [O] . Spiro P. Pantazatos, Mike F. Schmidt 2020

机译：在功能网络成像基因组中建立相关基因表达措施的内部有效性：为什么距离校正和外部面部有效性单独缩短。回复距离不是功能网络的成像基因组学中的一切：回复相关基因表达的评论支持脑网络中的同步活动
7. Toward Establishing Internal Validity for Correlated Gene Expression Measures in Imaging Genomics of Functional Networks: Why Distance Corrections and External Face Validity Alone Fall Short. Reply to “Distance Is Not Everything in Imaging Genomics of Functional Networks: Reply to a Commentary on Correlated Gene Expression Supports Synchronous Activity in Brain Networks” [O] . Spiro P. Pantazatos, Mike F. Schmidt 2020

机译：在功能网络成像基因组中建立相关基因表达措施的内部有效性：为什么距离校正和外部面部有效性单独缩短。回复“距离不是功能网络的成像基因组学中的一切：回复相关基因表达的评论支持脑网络中的同步活动”

Reply to Commentary by Juliet Mitchell: Siblings in Clinical Work

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅