...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological medicine >Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural, person-centred and psychodynamic therapies as practised in UK National Health Service settings.
【24h】

Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural, person-centred and psychodynamic therapies as practised in UK National Health Service settings.

机译:在英国国家卫生署(National Health Service)机构中实践的认知行为,以人为中心和心理动力疗法的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Psychotherapy's equivalence paradox is that treatments have equivalently positive outcomes despite non-equivalent theories and techniques. We compared the outcomes of contrasting approaches practised in routine care. METHOD: Patients (n = 1309) who received cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), person-centred therapy (PCT) and psychodynamic therapy (PDT) at one of 58 National Health Service (NHS) primary and secondary care sites in the UK during a 3-year period completed the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) at the beginning and end of their treatment. Therapists indicated which treatment approaches were used on an End of Therapy form. We compared outcomes of six groups: three treated with CBT, PCT or PDT only, and three treated with one of these plus one additional approach (e.g. integrative, supportive, art), designated CBT+1, PCT+1 or PDT+1 respectively. RESULTS: All six groups averaged marked improvement (pre-post effect size = 1.36). Treatment approach and degree of purity ('only' vs. '+1') each accounted for statistically significant but comparatively tiny proportions of the variance in CORE-OM scores (respectively 1% and 0.5% as much as pre-post change). Distributions of change scores were largely overlapping. CONCLUSIONS: Results for these three treatment approaches as practised routinely across a range of NHS settings were generally consistent with previous findings that theoretically different approaches tend to have equivalent outcomes. Caution is warranted because of limited treatment specification, non-random assignment, lack of a control group, missing data and other issues.
机译:背景:心理疗法的等价悖论是,尽管理论和技术不尽相同,治疗也具有同样积极的结果。我们比较了常规护理中不同方法的结果。方法:n期间在英国58个国家卫生服务(NHS)一级和二级护理地点之一接受认知行为疗法(CBT),以人为本的疗法(PCT)和心理动力疗法(PDT)的患者(n = 1309)在治疗的开始和结束时,为期3年的时间完成了常规评估的临床结果-措施(CORE-OM)。治疗师指出“治疗结束”表格上使用了哪种治疗方法。我们比较了六组的结果:三组仅使用CBT,PCT或PDT治疗,三组使用其中一种加上一种其他方法(例如,整合,支持,艺术)治疗,分别指定为CBT + 1,PCT + 1或PDT + 1 。结果:所有六个组的平均显着改善(事前效应大小= 1.36)。处理方法和纯度(“仅”与“ +1”)各占CORE-OM分数方差的统计学上显着但相对较小的比例(分别为岗位变更前的1%和0.5%)。变化分数的分布在很大程度上是重叠的。结论:这三种治疗方法在一系列NHS设置中的常规操作结果与以前的发现基本一致,即理论上不同的方法往往具有相同的结果。由于治疗规范有限,分配不随机,缺少对照组,数据丢失和其他问题,因此应谨慎行事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号