...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public Administration and Development >AID EFFECTIVENESS AND THE PARIS DECLARATION: A MISMATCH BETWEEN OWNERSHIP AND RESULTS-BASED MANAGEMENT?
【24h】

AID EFFECTIVENESS AND THE PARIS DECLARATION: A MISMATCH BETWEEN OWNERSHIP AND RESULTS-BASED MANAGEMENT?

机译：援助的有效性和巴黎宣言：所有权和基于结果的管理之间的错位？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although recent years have witnessed substantial changes in the global aid architecture, less effort has been devoted to investigating the process of implementing those changes. By using the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) as an illustrative and critical case, this article shows how a donor development priority-gender-travels from Stockholm and headquarters to a Paris Declaration-infused aid practice in three cases with different aid modalities: Tanzania, Zanzibar, and Cambodia. More specifically, the qualitative empirical investigation conducted here shows that the implementation of the new aid architecture puts severe and competing demands on development practitioners. At the core of this tension is the fact that although all donors are supposed to promote partner country ownership, harmonize their efforts with other donors, and align themselves with partner country priorities, results-based management simultaneously implies not only a focus on continuously measuring and reporting results but also stricter prioritizations on behalf of donor governments.
机译：尽管近年来目睹了全球援助架构的重大变化，但投入较少的精力来研究实施这些变化的过程。通过使用瑞典国际开发合作署（Sida）作为说明性和关键案例，本文展示了三种情况下具有不同援助方式的捐助者发展优先事项-从斯德哥尔摩和总部到巴黎宣言注入援助实践的性别旅行：坦桑尼亚，桑给巴尔和柬埔寨。更具体地说，此处进行的定性经验研究表明，新援助架构的实施对开发从业人员提出了严峻的竞争要求。这种紧张关系的核心是，尽管所有捐助者都应促进伙伴国的所有权，与其他捐助者协调其努力，并使自己与伙伴国的优先事项保持一致，但基于结果的管理同时意味着不仅要注重持续衡量和报告结果，但也代表捐助国政府制定更严格的优先级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号