...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public administration review >Government Reform, Political Ideology, and Administrative Burden: The Case of Performance Management in the Bush Administration
【24h】

Government Reform, Political Ideology, and Administrative Burden: The Case of Performance Management in the Bush Administration

机译：政府改革，政治思想与行政负担：以布什政府的绩效管理为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article examines how ideological differences between political officials and agencies may have affected the implementation of an ostensibly nonpartisan, government-wide administrative initiative: the George W. Bush administration's Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) review of federal programs. The analysis reveals that managers in agencies associated with liberal programs and employees ("liberal agencies") agreed to a greater extent than those in agencies associated with conservative programs and employees ("conservative agencies") that PART required significant agency time and effort and that it imposed a burden on management resources. Further analysis reveals that differences in reported agency effort can be explained partly by objective differences in the demands that PART placed on agencies-liberal agencies were required to evaluate more programs and implement more improvement plans relative to their organizational capacity-and partly by the ideological beliefs of employees-on average, liberal managers reported more agency effort, even after accounting for objective measures of administrative burden.
机译：本文探讨了政治官员和机构之间的意识形态差异如何影响表面上无党派的，政府范围内的行政计划的实施：乔治·W·布什政府对联邦计划的计划评估评级工具（PART）的审查。该分析表明，与自由计划和雇员相关的机构（“自由机构”）的经理比在与保守计划和雇员相关的机构（“保守机构”）中的经理更大程度地同意，PART需要大量的机构时间和精力，并且这给管理资源带来了负担。进一步的分析表明，所报告的代理工作的差异部分可以由客观上的差异来解释，这些要求是：对代理的要求–自由机构必须评估相对于其组织能力的更多计划和实施更多改进计划–部分是由于意识形态上的信念就员工人数而言，即使考虑到客观的管理负担，自由主义者的经理平均仍报告了更多的机构努力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号