...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public performance & management review >BRINGING PARTICIPATORY TOOLS TO A DIFFERENT LEVEL: A CASE STUDY OF LOCAL PARTICIPATORY PRACTICES IN KYRGYZSTAN
【24h】

BRINGING PARTICIPATORY TOOLS TO A DIFFERENT LEVEL: A CASE STUDY OF LOCAL PARTICIPATORY PRACTICES IN KYRGYZSTAN

机译：将参与工具带入不同层次：以吉尔吉斯斯坦当地参与实践为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Engaging citizens in decision-making has become an important function of governments around the world. Local administrators facing budget constraints are interested in citizen feedback on a growing number of issues related to government performance. Based primarily on American evidence, the public administration literature notes that citizen-engagement tools have advantages and disadvantages. Some theorists suggest that combining participatory tools can maximize their effects. This article extends the analysis by a consideration of how local governments in Kyrgyzstan, a transitional democracy, implemented participatory tools. It finds that merging such tools as citizen report cards and budget hearings led to improved participation outcomes, including changes in government service delivery. The study has important implications for developing effective participatory techniques.
机译：使公民参与决策已成为世界各国政府的重要职能。面临预算限制的地方行政管理人员对公民对越来越多与政府绩效有关的问题的反馈意见很感兴趣。公共行政文献主要基于美国的证据，指出公民参与工具具有优缺点。一些理论家建议，将参与性工具结合起来可以最大程度地发挥其作用。本文通过考虑吉尔吉斯斯坦（一个过渡民主国家）的地方政府如何实施参与性工具来扩展分析。研究发现，将公民报告卡和预算听证会等工具合并在一起，可以改善参与成果，包括改变政府提供的服务。该研究对开发有效的参与技术具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号