首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >Public judgment on science expenditure in the national budget of Japan: An experimental approach to examining the effects of unpacking science
【24h】

Public judgment on science expenditure in the national budget of Japan: An experimental approach to examining the effects of unpacking science

机译:日本国家预算中对科学支出的公开判断:检验科学解体效果的实验方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

How does the public assess an appropriate financial allocation to science promotion? This article empirically examined the subadditivity effect in the judgment of budgetary allocation. Results of the first experiment showed that the ratio of the national budget allocated for science promotion by participants increased when science was decomposed into more specific categories compared to when it was presented as "science promotion" alone. Consistent with these findings, results of the second experiment showed that the allotment ratio to science promotion decreased when the number of other expenditure items increased. Meanwhile, the third experiment revealed that in the case of a budgetary cutback, the total amount taken from science promotion greatly increased when science was decomposed into subcategories. The subadditivity effect and increase in the total allotment ratio by unpacking science promotion was confirmed by these three experiments not only on budgetary allocation but also on budgetary cutback.
机译:公众如何评估科学促进的适当财政拨款?本文从经验上考察了预算分配判断中的次加性效应。第一个实验的结果表明,与将科学单独表示为“科学促进”时相比,将科学分解为更具体的类别时,参与者分配给科学促进的国家预算的比例有所增加。与这些发现一致的是,第二个实验的结果表明,当其他支出项目的数量增加时,对科学促进的拨款比率就会降低。同时,第三个实验表明,在削减预算的情况下,将科学分解为子类别后,从科学促进中获得的总金额大大增加了。这三个实验不仅在预算分配上,而且在预算削减上,都证实了副加和效应和通过科学促进活动而增加了总分配比率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号