• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >A Case Of Conflicting Norms? Mobilizing And Accountability Information In Newspaper Coverage Of The Autism-Vaccine Controversy
【24h】

A Case Of Conflicting Norms? Mobilizing And Accountability Information In Newspaper Coverage Of The Autism-Vaccine Controversy

机译：一个冲突的案例？自闭症疫苗争议报纸报道中的动员和问责信息

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

When reporting health risks, the news media are often criticized for omitting "mobilizing" information that allows readers to act on existing attitudes. Using American and British newspaper coverage of the autism-vaccine controversy as a case study, this article takes a "behind the scenes" look at normative pressures that may influence whether such information appears in coverage. In particular, can holding health officials accountable for their actions potentially "crowd out" mobilizing information? A content analysis suggests that mobilizing information (at least one of four examples) was present in only 16% of articles, compared to 38% that mentioned accountability messages (at least one of two examples). US newspapers were significantly more likely to mention at least one mobilization example. Finally, although only 11% discussed both, articles were more likely to discuss certain mobilizing and accountability examples together. Implications for journalism ethics and vaccine risk communication are discussed.
机译：当报道健康风险时，新闻媒体经常因忽略“动员”信息而受到批评，这些信息使读者可以按照现有的态度采取行动。本文以美国和英国报纸对自闭症疫苗争议的报道为案例研究，以“幕后”的眼光看待可能影响此类信息是否出现在报道中的规范压力。特别是，让卫生官员对他们的行为负责可能会“挤出”动员信息吗？内容分析表明，动员信息（四个示例中的至少一个）仅出现在16％的文章中，而提到责任信息的38％（至少两个示例中的一个）。美国报纸更有可能提到至少一个动员的例子。最后，尽管只有11％的人同时讨论了两者，但文章更有可能一起讨论某些动员和问责制示例。讨论了对新闻道德和疫苗风险交流的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号