首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative research journal >Outing autoethnography: an exploration of relational ethics in queer autoethnographic research
【24h】

Outing autoethnography: an exploration of relational ethics in queer autoethnographic research

机译:郊外民族志:同性恋民族志研究中的关系伦理学探索

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to open up a deeper, more complex discussion about ethical issues in queer autoethnography, by moving beyond either an outline of seminal autoethnographic thinkers, instigators, and writers, or a simple rearticulation of the key issues currently under discussion within the field of autoethnographic ethics. Design/methodology/approach - The author's intention is to queer autoethnographic ethics - that is, to employ queering as a verb, and to queerly examine autoethnographic scholars through the problematizing lenses of unexamined privilege, and of potential ethical violence to the researcher. After this, the author turns to theological writers to help us to queer the notions of ethical certainty, challenging our fear of ideological uncertainty, our fear of the body, and our fear of ambiguity. Findings - This paper offers a more expansive and challenging approach to traditional autoethnographic ethical guidelines. It also raises several significant questions for ongoing scholarly discussion in the field. Originality/value - It is hoped is that this paper will open up new possibilities and trajectories in the ongoing debates about autoethnographic ethics.
机译:目的-本文的目的是通过超越开创性的民族志思想家,煽动者和作家的轮廓,或简单地重新阐述当前正在研究的关键问题,来展开关于同性恋民族志中伦理问题的更深入,更复杂的讨论。在民族志伦理学领域的讨论。设计/方法论/方法-作者的意图是追寻民族志学的伦理学-即,将追魂学作为动词,并通过对未经审查的特权以及对研究人员潜在的道德暴力的质疑来对民族志学学者进行质询。之后,作者求助于神学作家,以帮助我们质疑道德确定性的观念,挑战我们对意识形态不确定性的恐惧,对身体的恐惧以及对歧义的恐惧。调查结果-本文为传统的民族志伦理准则提供了更广阔,更具挑战性的方法。这也为该领域正在进行的学术讨论提出了几个重要问题。原创性/价值-希望本文能在有关民族志学伦理学的持续辩论中开辟新的可能性和轨迹。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号