...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Records management journal >Digital diplomatics and measurement of electronic public data qualities: What lessons should be learned?
【24h】

Digital diplomatics and measurement of electronic public data qualities: What lessons should be learned?

机译：数字外交和电子公共数据质量的衡量：应该汲取哪些教训？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to present a recent study on the definition and measurement of quality dimensions of public electronic records and archives (QADEPs: Qualites des archives et documents electroniques publics). It develops an original model and a complete method with tools to define and measure electronic public data qualities within public institutions. It highlights also the relationship between diplomatics principles and the measurement of trustworthiness of electronic data in particular. This paper presents a general overview of the main results of this study, with also illustrative examples to demonstrate the feasibility of measuring the qualities of electronic archives in the context of public institutions. Design/methodology/approach - This research was conducted in two phases. The first one was the conceptual phase in which the quality dimensions were identified and defined with specific sets of indicators and variables. The second phase was the empirical phase which involved the testing of the model on real electronic documents belonging to several public institutions to validate its relevance and applicability. These tests were performed at the Archives of the State of Wallis and the Archives of the State of Geneva, thanks to different measurement tools designed especially for this stage of the research. Findings - The QADEPs model analyzes the qualities of electronic records in public institutions through three dimensions: trustworthiness, exploitability and representativeness. These dimensions were divided into eight sub-dimensions comprising 17 indicators for a total of 46 variables. These dimensions and their variables tried to cover the main aspects of quality standards for electronic data and public documents. The study demonstrates that nearly 60 per cent of the measured variables could be automated. Research limitations/implications - The QADEPs model was defined and tested in a Swiss context on a limited sample of electronic public data to validate, essentially, its feasibility. It would be useful to extend this approach and test it on a broader sample in different contexts abroad. Practical implications - The decisionmaking of records retention in organizations and public institutions in particular is difficult to establish and justify because it is based generally on subjective and non-defendable practices. The QADEPs model offers specific metrics with their related measuring tools to evaluate and identify what is valuable and what is eliminable within the whole set of institutional electronic information. The model should reinforce the information governance of those institutions and help them control the risks related to information management. Originality/value - The current practice of archival appraisal does not yet invest in a meticulous examination of the nature of documents that should be preserved permanently. The lack of studies on the definition and measurement of the qualities of electronic and public electronic records prevents verification as to whether archival materials are significant. This paper fills in some of the gaps.
机译：目的-本文旨在介绍有关公共电子记录和档案的质量维度的定义和度量的最新研究（QADEP：Qualites des Archives et Documents electiques publics）。它开发了原始模型和具有定义和衡量公共机构内电子公共数据质量的工具的完整方法。它还特别强调了外交原则与电子数据可信赖性度量之间的关系。本文概述了这项研究的主要成果，并举例说明了在公共机构背景下衡量电子档案质量的可行性。设计/方法/方法-这项研究分两个阶段进行。第一个阶段是概念阶段，在此阶段，通过特定的指标和变量集来确定和定义质量维度。第二阶段是经验阶段，涉及对属于几个公共机构的真实电子文档进行模型测试，以验证其相关性和适用性。这些测试是在瓦利斯州档案馆和日内瓦州档案馆进行的，这要归功于为这一研究阶段专门设计的不同测量工具。调查结果-QADEPs模型通过三个维度来分析公共机构中电子记录的质量：可信赖性，可利用性和代表性。这些维度分为八个子维度，包括17个指标，总共46个变量。这些维度及其变量试图覆盖电子数据和公共文档的质量标准的主要方面。研究表明，将近60％的测量变量可以自动化。研究的局限性/意义-QADEPs模型是在瑞士范围内对有限的电子公共数据样本进行定义和测试的，以从本质上验证其可行性。扩展此方法并在国外不同环境中对更广泛的样本进行测试将很有用。实际意义-特别是在组织和公共机构中保存记录的决策很难建立和证明其合理性，因为它通常基于主观和不可辩护的做法。 QADEPs模型提供了特定的指标及其相关的测量工具，以评估和识别整个机构电子信息中有价值的东西和可消除的东西。该模型应加强这些机构的信息治理，并帮助它们控制与信息管理有关的风险。原创性/价值-档案评估的当前做法尚未投入对应永久保存的文件性质进行的仔细检查。缺乏对电子和公共电子记录的质量的定义和衡量的研究，无法验证档案材料是否重要。本文填补了一些空白。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号