...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Records management journal >Opening research data: issues and opportunities
【24h】

Opening research data: issues and opportunities

机译：开放研究数据：问题与机遇

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to explore the issues, the role of research data management (RDM) as a mechanism for implementing open research data and the role and opportunities for records managers. The open data agenda is premised on making as much data as possible open and available. However, in the context of open research data there are methodological, ethical and practical issues with this premise. Design/methodology/approach - Two collaborative research projects focusing on qualitative health data were conducted. "DATUM for Health" designed and delivered a tailored RDM skills training programme for postgraduate research students in health studies. "DATUM in Action" was an action research project between researchers from information sciences, health, mathematics and computing, looking at planning and implementing RDM. Findings - Three key issues emerged about what research data is appropriate to make open/ accessible for sharing and reuse: re-using qualitative data conflicts with some of the epistemological and methodological principles of qualitative research; there are ethical concerns about making data obtained from human participants open, which are not completely addressed by consent and anonymisation; many research projects are small scale and the costs of preparing and curating data for open access can outweigh its value. In exploring these issues, the authors advocate the need for effective appraisal skills and researcher-focused RDM with records managers playing a useful role. Research limitations/implications - The findings come from two small-scale qualitative projects in health studies. Further exploration of these issues is required. Practical implications - Records managers have new crucial opportunities in the open data and RDM contexts, bringing their expertise and experience in managing a wider range of data and information. They can help realise the benefits of multiple perspectives (researcher, data manager, records manager and archivist) on open research data. Social implications - Researcher-focused RDM offers a mechanism for implementing open research data. Originality/value - It raises complex issues around open research data not found in the records management literature, highlights the need for researcher-focussed RDM and research data appraisal skills and a not yet fully recognised role for records managers.
机译：目的-本文旨在探讨问题，研究数据管理（RDM）作为实施公开研究数据的机制的作用以及记录管理者的角色和机会。开放数据议程的前提是使尽可能多的数据开放和可用。然而，在开放研究数据的背景下，在此前提下存在方法论，伦理学和实践问题。设计/方法/方法-进行了两个针对定性健康数据的合作研究项目。 “ DATUM for Health”为健康研究的研究生设计并提供了量身定制的RDM技能培训计划。 “行动中的DATUM”是一个信息科学，健康，数学和计算机研究人员之间的行动研究项目，旨在研究RDM的计划和实施。调查结果-有关哪些研究数据适合公开/访问以共享和重用的问题出现了三个关键问题：重用定性数据与定性研究的某些认识论和方法论原则冲突；从公开的参与者那里获得的数据存在伦理上的顾虑，但不能通过同意和匿名化完全解决；许多研究项目规模很小，为开放访问准备和整理数据的成本可能超过其价值。在探讨这些问题时，作者主张需要有效的评估技能和以研究人员为中心的RDM，而记录管理人员应发挥有益的作用。研究局限性/意义-研究结果来自于健康研究中的两个小规模定性项目。需要进一步探讨这些问题。实际意义-记录管理者在开放数据和RDM环境中拥有新的关键机遇，他们在管理更广泛的数据和信息方面拥有专业知识和经验。它们可以帮助实现开放研究数据的多种观点（研究人员，数据管理人员，记录管理人员和档案管理员）的收益。社会影响-以研究人员为中心的RDM提供了一种实现开放式研究数据的机制。原创性/价值-围绕记录管理文献中未找到的开放研究数据提出了复杂的问题，强调了需要以研究人员为中心的RDM和研究数据评估技能，而记录管理人员的角色尚未得到充分认可。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号