• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Reflective Practice >Co‐constructing an appreciative and collective eye: appreciative reflection in action in lifelong career guidance
【24h】

Co‐constructing an appreciative and collective eye: appreciative reflection in action in lifelong career guidance

机译：共同构建欣赏和集体的眼光：在终身职业指导中的行动中的欣赏反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

That which has been given becomes a starting point for a quest, a starting point for a task that is by no means one of ownership. It is a task, rather, that revolves around a desire that will continue to learn that each of its forms of expression is a disappointment. (De Certeau, 2010, p. 7)This is not a paper, it is a space where the experiences of the participants in the Reflect‐OR project can be read directly. As a selection, albeit an agreed one, it is by definition a biased product and is influenced by the point of view of the person who, in one way or another, has organised it as a text. If we set out the criterion adopted, the process can be seen to be less partial. Of the many choices available, I preferred a narration/listening structure focusing on the concept of appreciative reflection. Taking this as my starting point, I adopted a second criterion: to include the greatest possible variability in the positions expressed on this subject. The third criterion was to group these in three thematic areas: 1. developing a collective and participatory appreciative memory;2. discovering the richness and strength of the group to foster well‐being in work; and3. adopting the organisation’s viewpoint to move on from a conflictual approach to change. These are the crucial issues on the road to developing an appreciative eye in the Reflect‐OR project. The voices speaking here can be read as reflections on appreciative reflection in action.View full textDownload full textKeywordsappreciative reflection, change, innovation, conflict, collective and participatory memory, well‐being in work, constructionist ethicsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2011.561530
机译：所给出的信息成为追求的起点，绝不是所有权的一项任务的起点。相反，这是一项围绕着一种愿望的任务，它将继续学习其每种表达形式都是令人失望的。 （De Certeau，2010年，第7页）这不是一篇论文，而是一个可以直接阅读Reflectâ€OR项目参与者经验的空间。作为一种选择，尽管是商定的选择，但从定义上来说，它是一种有偏见的产品，并受到以某种方式将其组织为文本的人的观点的影响。如果我们列出所采用的标准，那么该过程将显得不那么零散。在可用的众多选择中，我更喜欢一个关注/欣赏结构的叙述/聆听结构。以此为出发点，我采用了第二个标准：在该主题表达的立场中包括最大的可变性。第三个标准是将这些分为三个主题领域：1.建立集体和参与性的欣赏性记忆； 2。发现团队的丰富和力量以促进良好的工作状态；和3。采纳组织的观点，从冲突方法转变为变革。这些是在ReflectOR项目中发展鉴赏力的关键问题。可以将这里所说的声音理解为对行动中的反思的反思。 ＆Francis Online”，services_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2011.561530

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号