...
首页> 外文期刊>Res Publica >Just Procedures with Controversial Outcomes: On the Grounds for Substantive Disputation within a Procedural Theory of Justice
【24h】

Just Procedures with Controversial Outcomes: On the Grounds for Substantive Disputation within a Procedural Theory of Justice

机译:具有争议性结果的公正程序:基于程序正义论中的实质性争议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Acts of civil disobedience and conscientious objection provide valuable indications of the congruence of political outcomes with citizens’ conceptions of justice and the good. As their primary concern is substantive, their logic seems extraneous to procedural approaches to justice. Accordingly, it has often been argued that these latter condemn citizens to a ‘deaf-and-blind’ acceptance of the outcomes of agreed procedures. A closer analysis of such acts of contestation shall reveal that although, for proceduralism, the outcomes of just procedures cannot be contested as unjust, they may be contested on the ground of values other than justice, such as someone’s religious/ethical allegiances. Proceduralism about justice will be thus shown to be consistent with the commitment to realising certain outcome-oriented values.
机译:公民抗命和出于良心拒服兵役的行为,为政治结果与公民的正义与善意的融合提供了宝贵的迹象。由于他们的主要关切是实质性的,因此他们的逻辑似乎与程序性司法方法无关。因此,经常有人争辩说,这些人谴责公民“盲目地”接受商定程序的结果。仔细分析这种争端行为,应该发现,尽管就程序主义而言,正义程序的结果不能被认为是不公正的,但它们可能会以正义以外的其他价值为由而争辩,例如某人的宗教/道德忠诚。因此,关于正义的程序主义将被证明与实现某些以结果为导向的价值的承诺是一致的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号