...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Evidence on how academics manage their portfolio of knowledge transfer activities
【24h】

Evidence on how academics manage their portfolio of knowledge transfer activities

机译：有关学者如何管理知识转移活动的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to explore whether six broad categories of knowledge transfer activities undertaken by academics: the creation and diffusion of knowledge through publications, transmission of knowledge through teaching, informal knowledge transfer, patenting, spin-off formation and consulting activities, are complementary, substitute, or independent, as well as the conditions under which complementarities, substitution and independence among these activities are likely to emerge. This investigation relied on data regarding 1554 researchers funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Contrary to prior studies which have examined complementarities and the determinants of knowledge transfer activities in separate models, this study relied on a multivariate path model to reflect the fact that in practice, academics consider simultaneously whether or not to undertake multiple knowledge transfer activities. Overall, the results point to the existence of three very different types of knowledge transfer portfolios of activities: a first portfolio made up of complementary activities which are interdependent and reinforce each other. This portfolio includes publications, patenting, spin-off creation, consulting and informal knowledge transfer. A second portfolio includes teaching activities and publication outputs which are substitute for each other. A third portfolio comprises teaching activities and other activities independent from teaching, namely, patenting, spin-off creation, consulting and informal knowledge transfer. Each of these three portfolios of knowledge transfer activities emerged under different conditions. Implications are derived for managerial practice and future research.
机译：本文的目的是探讨学者们进行的六大类知识转移活动：通过出版物的知识创造和传播，通过教学的知识传播，非正式知识转移，专利，衍生产品的形成和咨询活动。互补，替代或独立，以及这些活动之间可能出现互补，替代和独立的条件。这项调查基于加拿大自然科学与工程研究委员会资助的1554名研究人员的数据。与先前的研究在不同模型中研究互补性和知识转移活动的决定因素的研究相反，本研究依靠多元路径模型来反映一个事实，即在实践中，学者们同时考虑是否进行多项知识转移活动。总体而言，结果表明存在三种非常不同类型的知识转移活动组合：第一个组合由相互依赖，相互促进的互补活动组成。该产品组合包括出版物，专利，衍生产品创建，咨询和非正式知识转移。第二类作品包括彼此替代的教学活动和出版物产出。第三个组合包括教学活动和与教学无关的其他活动，即专利，衍生产品创造，咨询和非正式知识转移。知识转移活动的这三个投资组合中的每一个都在不同的条件下出现。对管理实践和未来研究产生了影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Research policy》 |2010年第10期|p.1387-1403|共17页
  • 作者

    Rejean Landry; Malek Saihi; Nabil Amara; Mathieu Ouimet;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Management, Faculty of Business, Laval University, Quibec City, QC, G1 V 0A6, Canada;

    rnUniversity of Tunis, El Manor - Campus Universitaire Tunis, B.P. no. 94 - Rommana 1068, Tunisia;

    rnDepartment of Management, Faculty of Business, Laval University, Quibec City, QC, G1 V 0A6, Canada;

    rnDepartment of Political science, Faculty of Social sciences, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, G1 V 0A6, Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    academic activity; complementarities; substitution; knowledge transfer; multivariate path model;

    机译：学术活动;互补性代换;知识传输;多元路径模型;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号