首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >GM Foods and the Misperception of Risk Perception
【24h】

GM Foods and the Misperception of Risk Perception

机译:转基因食品和对风险的误解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Public opposition to genetically modified (GM) food and crops is widely interpreted as the result of the public's misperception of the risks. With scientific assessment pointing to no unique risks from GM crops and foods, a strategy of accurate risk communication from trusted sources has been advocated. This is based on the assumption that the benefits of GM crops and foods are self-evident. Informed by the interpretation of some qualitative interviews with lay people, we use data from the Eurobarometer survey on biotechnology to explore the hypothesis that it is not so much the perception of risks as the absence of benefits that is the basis of the widespread rejection of GM foods and crops by the European public. Some respondents perceive both risks and benefits, and may be trading off these attributes along the lines of a rational choice model. However, for others, one attribute―benefit―appears to dominate their judgments: the lexicographic heuristic. For these respondents, their perception of risk is of limited importance in the formation of attitudes toward GM food and crops. The implication is that the absence of perceived benefits from GM foods and crops calls into question the relevance of risk communication strategies for bringing about change in public opinion.
机译:公众对转基因食品和农作物的反对被广泛解释为公众对风险的误解的结果。由于科学评估指出转基因作物和食品没有独特的风险,因此提倡一种从可信来源进行准确风险沟通的策略。这是基于这样的假设,即转基因作物和食品的好处是不言而喻的。通过对与外行人士进行的一些定性访谈的解释,我们使用欧洲晴雨表生物技术调查的数据来探索一种假设,即不存在风险,而是因为缺乏利益才是普遍拒绝转基因的基础欧洲公众的粮食和农作物。一些受访者同时意识到风险和收益,并可能会按照理性选择模型来权衡这些属性。但是,对于其他人来说,似乎有一个属性-好处-支配着他们的判断:词典编排启发法。对于这些受访者而言,他们对风险的认识在对转基因食品和农作物的态度形成中意义不大。这就意味着,由于缺乏转基因食品和农作物的可观收益,人们质疑风险交流战略对于改变公众舆论的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号